You are ******ed. Did you see Diaz getting a gift against an EM who had NOTHING left? Did you see him getting beaten like he was absolutely nothing by Kendall Holt? Did you see him getting a MD against a journeyman the fight before Pacquiao? Diaz was propped up to give Pac an easy belt. If boxing wasn't so corrupt he would never have been a champ in the first place. Katsidis is a MONSTER compared to Diaz.
:rofl:rofl:rofl You guys seem to know a lot, I just don't know if you know that JMM in his boxing career so far has fought a total of 7 boxers aged 33 and above namely: Casamayor, 37; Barrera, 37; Polo, 35; Fletcher, 34; Arreola, 34; Mingo, 35 and Cruz, 34. On the other hand, Pac has only fought 4 boxers aged 33 and above and that include Marquez. The other old boxers whom Pac fought were: Delahoya, 35; Barrera, 33 and Julio, 33. So, I am saying with certainty that JMM is the much better executioner of old fighters than Pac!:happy:happy:happy
some of you guys are taking it THAT far. some of the posters here, like this mexican thread starter, are just ****ing annoying because they're always dissing pac and then when we pac fans defend him they call us *******s. see? double standard.
i'm annoying, mutha****a, i'm asking why do *******s talk down on marquez but make david diaz sound like a great win...and when i say *******s, i dont mean the real boxing/pacman fans, i mean the little ***s that dont know **** but have the nuts to talk down on marquez..... when the **** have you ever seen me speak bad about manny....all i've said is the truth about him, now just cause i dont lick the lint off of the tip of his dick i'm some kind of hater :huh
David Diaz KOed Sta. Cruz who schooled but was robbed by casa... Old shot Casa beat overrated boxer Katsidis... who went to hell with ceasar ****'n amonsot. :yep I'm just saying... please visit my thread... JMM needs more mexican votes. :good http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=126197
freddy you should stop worrying bout pac... why do i feel some insecurities here? mexicans ain't got nothing on pacman. :deal suck it up!
Marquez has the better resume over the past two years?, you must be foolish or just doing this out of desperation and stupidity. Let's take a look at their records in the past two years. Manny Pacuiqao-2007 Jorge Solis - Won by KO in round 8 Marco Antonio Barrera - Won by Unanimous decision Juan Manuel Marquez-2007 Rocky Juarez - Won by UD Marco Antonio Barrera - Won by UD It's pretty damn clear who's wins are better in 2007, Manny Pacquiao wins it and easily. He fought an undefeated solid fighter in Solis and KO'd him in 8 rounds. The same Solis who's building up a winning streak now and going far enough to be fighting for title eliminators. Then both fight Barrera, it's damn clear who's winning and winning EASILY in this one, Marquez went life and DEATH with Barrera and was knocked down late but was scored a slip, many people had that fight won for Barrera. Pacquiao dominated Barrera from round 1 to 12, Barrera was literally there to survive and say he went the distance rather than make an attempt to win. Manny Pacquiao-2008 Juan Manuel Marquez - Won by SD David Diaz - Won by KO in round 9 Oscar De La Hoya - Won by TKO in round 8 Juan Manuel Marquez-2008 Manny Pacquiao - lost by SD Joel Casamayor - won by TKO in round 11 David Diaz - Won by TKO in round 9 Clearly Manny Pacquiao wins in 2008 yet again and easily. The only fight that we can't compare together in 2008 is Casamayor and Diaz, easily the Casamayor fight wins it for Marquez. Sadly, Pacquiao has none other than Marquez his self on his record and as a WIN in 2008, then let's compare a win over Juan Diaz to moving up two weight divisions as a HUGE underdog to annihilate De La Hoya, even Marquez his self didn't think Pacquiao can make it through that fight and considered him foolish for taking it. Only an idiot would compare a win over Juan Diaz to moving up two weight divisions as a huge underdog to fight De La Hoya, last I checked Marquez was a safe favorite going in against Diaz and for obvious reasons. Sorry, but if Marquez was doing better the last two years as you would like to believe for unknown reasons to me apart from stupidity or being a newbie then he wasn't going to be competing with Joe ****in' Calzaghe for crying out loud for the #2 P4P position, as far as I remember people had Marquez BELOW Calzaghe after his loss to Pacquiao but after bulding a decent resume he climbed to #2 and easily replaced Calzaghe who continued to fight his grandfathers, he DOESN'T move up to #1. Hell, if Calzaghe was active people would still have him as #2 or argue that he deserves it more than Marquez. #1?!, you must be ****ing crazy or one of Freddy "KFC" Lok's crew of Zinger munchers.
juan is better than david. nestea didnt say the other way around, he just stated that david was so underrated, which i think is true.