Sadly, the end is nigh for Hatton.

How is Bradley more proven than Collazo?

Bearing in mind Urango was much more difficult than Malignaggi, how is one tier 2 and one tier 3?

Who the **** wants a Quintana fight? How does that fight make sense anywhere other than your head?

Hatton's in talks with JMM, so that fight could still happen. Even so, has that fight been a real possibility for any longer than 5 minutes? If Hatton fights Pac, how can you say he should be fighting JMM?

 

Who said anything about 'proven'?

Malignaggi was regarded by most to be a hard opponent...hence higher opposition, similar reward to fighting a lesser fighter

Quintana has only lost against 2 world class fighters...and beaten one of them, only Hatton fans would say Urango or Collazo are harder fighter than Quintana

 

Quintana's only fought two world class fighters and lost to both of them, both by destruction.

Collazo's fought two world class fighters, lost to both of them, pushed one all the way and went 12 rounds with one with a broken hand.

And all of a sudden it's clear that Quintana is much better?

I'd say Collazo is a higher tier than Bradley. By beating Collazo, he overcame a southpaw, a bigger guy and won a belt at a higher weight. If he beats Bradley, so what?

 

He beat Williams once and gave Cotto alot of trouble if you remember

Mosley and who else?
Many fighters break there hands....

Much?-Nah, Better?-Yes

Firstly Collazo boxed Hatton about the place, winnning the fight in alot of peoples opinion
If he beats Bradley, he beats the man who beat the man Hatton avoided at certain stages....

 

Did I just see Healy pull out that shitty old "real fan" argument? This from a guy who has been following the sport for all of 2 years.

 

what he is trying to say is he doesnt like ricky hatton full stop

 

Following it for 10 years, especially McCullough, Lewis, Tyson and the bigger fighters in the late 90s early 00s, 3 years solidly, watching 100s of non title fights nevermind the countless night iv stayed up over them 3 years, read 100s of articles, listened and watched, hence making me a real fan

I dont have to prove anything

Dont try and make it seem like im not a real boxing fan on the open forum to make my point seem less valid, you ****

 

Didn't you say Paulie would win easily?

I am rarely wrong in my picks, and I think this is a 50/50 fight. Pacman can be hurt and he can be backed up, he is not difficult to hit either. Mark my words this is nothing like the one sided PBF fight whatever the outcome is at the last bell.

 

Hatton Vs Pac will be an easy win for Hatton. Hatton Is too big and Manny Isn't a skilled fighter like Floyd.

Manny's fast but one dimensional and naturally two weights smaller so Ricky should get get the KO.

 

It wasn't me who pulled the "real fan" bull****, you're the one who went down that tired old route so don't get get on your high horse with me you ****ing homo.

 

Ya i did....not easily but clear, about 8 rounds to 4. Also stated that it was a hard fight to pick in, but that my theory was Paulie would be too slick

I make decent picks also, was wrong with Paulie and Oscar beating Pacman but very few others this year.

What about the southpaw stance factor?

 

Ya cause the majority of Hatton fans know about 5 fighters, deal with it.

Homo? what an insult.

 

Most knew enough to see that Paulie Malinaggi wasn't going to cause Hatton any problems.

And I appreciate that "homo" isn't up there with "****" as far as intelligent insults are concerned but we havn't all had the benefit of a university education.

 

Thought his style would warrent him in with a great chance of making Hatton look poor. Id love to go back to this time last year and see what you said about Hatton v PBF and if you gave Hatton a chance when 'most knew enough' to know what was going to happen

You are a **** for trying to say im not a real boxing fan in order to make less valid my point to those viewing this thread. Your theory is based on the fact im only following boxing fulltime and studying it for 3 years (dispite seeing Hatton,Calzaghe and more down through the years), its a stupid and ignorant comment to make.

Your homo comment is just out of the blue and obviously based of some impression you have built up of me

Either way its irrelevant as you undermine my comments so dont take me seriously because i wasnt a born boxing fan.

 

Why do you need to fight Timothy Bradley to 'prove yourself' when you've beaten Tszyu, Castillo, Mailgnaggi, couple of other belt holders at 140, won a belt at 147 and just lost to the P4P no.1 at 147?

Witter is the only name on your list that can be levelled at Hatton. And that's a stretch. Mosley and Judah haven't seen 140 for years. JMM has only just seen 135 you dimwit.

Cotto and Quintana have never been on the radar, have you ever heard Arum suggest they fight? And both moved up a while back. Bradley was an unknown until he beat Witter.

All in all that's a terrible post full of holes matey. Utter bollocks. That tier one / tier two nonsense - embarrassing.

Keep studying but I fear you've an inherent, well, stupidity that means you'll never understand the finer points of anything.