saint george groves is proof!!

I can't stand FW, but he did a good job with Groves.

George has served an excellent apprenticeship IMO and has, untill recently, been prepared perfectly for the big time. He's faced a different range of styles, he's been cut, knocked down, travelled abroad and away from home, and generally faced a good quality of opposition.

 

and this is more down to adam booth and his management than it is any promoter. he kept the right to take GG out on foreign cards and hes as much about picking the opponents as the promoters are

 

I agree, my point was that Eddie has suddenly done a much better job with him than FW, and I say that as a big Matchroom fan.

 

I think groves has had a good apprenticeship with frank and some good activity with Hearn
It should all bear well for the future

I want to see a degale rematch,he will be tested and we will see if he has improved as much as people believe

 

Im a big fan of Groves, although im probably in the minority on this but i believe he would give Froch a really good fight now ... let alone further down the line.

 

He would, he's an excellent young fighter.

I think he'd get stopped late after giving a good account of himself though.

 

I had to laugh when i looked at big screen for Groves interview and Eddie mentioned stepping it up now. Booth's face ..

 

for groves to sneak in another keep busy fight before his big september show we have been told about is a bit of joke hes rated in the top 5 with all the organisations.

no problem at all taking a couple to get going again but 4 in a row against nobodys????

saturday was meant to be chief support of a huge ppv event - did it deserve that really??

and what is likely to be goin in on september theres been no real talk of stieglitz or will they take another keep busy fight in the hope they can get froch in november on ppv for big money

 

Degale groves can happen at least 2 more times as long as chunky wins the next one

 

I misread the title, I thught it Saint George Groves is a poof, I thought it was a bit harsh.

 

same

 

Adam Booth should take a big portion of the credit. He seems to be the one in control of Groves fights.

 

I confused like a mother****er. Under Hearn Groves has fought often but against weak competition, under Frank he fougjt less often but against a much higher level of opposition so how exactly is Groves "proof" of whatever Hearn related point you were trying to make ?

Adam Booth is the one responsible for guoding Groves career and ge's done a bang up job