Salido says the Lomachenko money ain't good,,, till ducking?

No. It was his debut. Same with Pac losing early to Torry baby. I make fun of him losing to Torrecampo but he didn't have to rematch that fight. It just told us that Pac always had a suspect chin. Now the Singsurat fight, he should've rematched Singsurat.

 

LoooL!!

"Check his 10 year old Dell out yo!! LMAO Lol Lmbao looool LMMFAO ****en crooked ass teeth no up to date computer haven ****en Fred Flinstone ass motha ****er."

BlissyBliss

 

So if it's the first fight it's fine but if its the second fight it's a completely different story?

Sounds to me like you're just looking for reason to drop some hateraid

 

No, it sounds like you haven't a clue what I'm talking about. And I'm a grown man. I don't hate on fighters just to hate. Dafuq

 

The guy won the light weight gold medal in 2012 in London so he finished his amateur career as light weigh he has been feeding on smaller guys I don't see a problem fighting Micky at 135.

 

He only moved up to LW because the FW division was eradicated.
He was very small at LW.
These guys with the much bigger frames were living a different way to boxers do in pros where they jump in weight for fight night, these LW's had to stay not too far from LW weight.
LW was 132lbs not 135lbs in amateurs.
He was much smaller than everybody at 132.
He still kicked ass.
TBE level Lomachenko is in the featherweight divisions.

 

Lomachenko is the most skilled fighter in boxing history!!!

Salido will not fight Lomachenko for any amount of money, he knows he will get knocked out even with his personal referee Lawrence Cole, the worst referee in boxing history..............

 

There have been twenty or thirty guys in the gloved era with his kind of skills and they all lost to someone. There are ways to beat highly skilled opponents that don't include being more skilled than them. For instance, Lomachenko's not as physically gifted as he is skilled. He could get overpowered or out sped. He could get outhustled by a boxer with more stamina. We've already seen the more experienced Salido make him fight his fight, foul, and out plan him. There's always a way. How many fights have we seen guys win they weren't supposed to?

Part of me wonders if Lomachenko is going to turn into Jorge Linares at lightweight with featherfists, bad cuts, and no chin.

 

You're right I don't have a clue, it sounds very extreme to **** on the rest of a career because of a loss in their second pro fight (losing first fight OK though) , whether avenged or not, it's no different than Hopkins. For chrissake give the man a little credit for the level of challenge he took in that second fight it was a hell of a lot harder than Hopkins first fight

If one early loss is more important than the balance of a career I guess you have to just decide what's the most important to you as a fan, I think if you're going to be crapping on Loma the rest of his career you're going to be in the minority

 

I don't really care about the losses before you win the title. I poke fun at Wlad losing to Purrity, Pac losing to Torrecampo, and others who may have lost before their title shot. That's still the learning process. But once you win or challenge for a title, if you lose...you do the rematch period no ifs ands or buts. You do everything in your power to make the rematch.

And don't fall back on the 2nd pro fight excuse now when it's convenient. The amount of fights argument is used to give him props, not to knock him after a loss. And you're using it as an excuse now. And I don't get it. Don't you want to see the rematch? Don't you? Don't you want to see Loma win the rematch? As a fighter when you lose, there is a burning desire to go after and win the rematch. So try to think of yourself as a boxer and imagine that you lost a fight where you almost caught up to Salido late, but lost. Are you telling me that you won't go after the rematch?

 

OK thanks for the explanation , yes I want to see the fight of course but if it doesn't happen for whatever reason I will not hold it against him forever.

I saw somebody on here the other day said loma should literally fight for free if that's what it takes and I just think that's ridiculous. Just my opinion but if I were Loma I would be secure in the knowledge that I was coming on late in the fight rather than overpay to get him back in the ring.

To be fair I don't know the numbers being discussed but I look at it both ways, if Siri doesn't want the payday then screw him, on to bigger and better things

 

So we can end this conversation knowing that if Loma doesn't do the rematch that every time someone tries to put him at pfp best or high on the list, I'll just bring up Salido and his style that troubled him and that you won't have a word to say back that will be meaningful other than excuses...and that Loma will be penalized in history. That's the part that you don't care about because if you fought you would understand my point about revenge. And if Loma has one of if not the best starting resumes in history then he can criticized for not making the rematch.

 

No I would say we're going to have to agree to disagree. My belief is that Loma is already up high P4P and will end up on the all-time great list, with or without that rematch.

I think your viewpoint is extreme to put that night above all that he is likely to accomplish. History will judge, not you

In the end this is a business first, if there is a fair offer and Siri won't take it then oh well there's money to be made elsewhere. But hopefully this whole exchange is moot, last i heard it was on track for later this summer (?)