Salvador Sanchez.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Apr 25, 2013.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    What are your personal thoughts on him? How do you think his career would have gone if he hadn't died? Do you think he could have become the GOAT at Featherweight? I personally feel he had all the tools be an ATG: good jab, good footwork, great chin, and decent power.
     
  2. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Great fighter.

    Maybe a bit overestimated sometimes as a technical boxer-puncher, but his strong skill, good versatility and great stamina\mentality\durability make for a formidable overall package.
     
  3. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    He still has a decent resume, in spite of his short career.
     
  4. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Wasn't Gomez a Top 5 P4P fighter before he fought Sanchez?
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007
    I actually think he gets underated now with the whole "people overate him cos he died" angle.
     
  6. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,554
    3,755
    May 4, 2012
    Sanchez was the underdog against Gomez IIRC (that carries weight for me)

    Came up with this after watching some Youtube highlight vids
    _____________

    Sanchez does not need to be propped up by sentimentality and sensationalism—he boxed a career before his death at the tender age of just twenty-three.

    Consider: Sanchez has as many wins as Wilfredo Gomez, fewer losses than Wilfredo Gomez, and like Gomez he never lost his (featherweight) title in the ring. He boasts more defenses of his title than Vicente Saldivar, and, as we shall see, his level of competition is comparable. It is not for the sake of tender feeling or a dwindled sense of what could have been that he is ranked a hair’s breadth in front of his fellow Latin American compeers but rather the overall sense that he combines the best of what makes them both great.

    Sanchez won sixteen of his first seventeen fights by knockout and then dropped a split decision to Antonio Beccera down at bantamweight before stepping up to complete what would be perhaps the second most celebrated run ever at featherweight (the first is locked down by a fighter very near the top of this list, and if you don’t know who that is, you will by the end of the series). It would last from late 1977 until summer of 1982 and included the deeply unpleasant job of picking up the featherweight title from Danny Lopez, likely the hardest hitter ever at the weight.

    Sanchez looked sensational in the first round of their February 1980 contest, a jab that came all the way from his toes and a hook that looked like it might be a jab until it landed, a shucking, sliding style that did not compromise his offense and, given that he was only twenty-one years old, an almost offensive confidence bordering on smugness putting him firmly in control. His confidence was justified as over and over again he slipped the Lopez jab and found a punch.

    It was not abnormal for Lopez to have a bad first round, but it was abnormal for such an aggressive showing to bring such roaring success. Sanchez was able to box-punch Lopez in range without allowing him to get his offense going and when in the eighth round he felt that Lopez had become worn, he initiated bruising exchanges, coming out almost exclusively ahead. When the champion finally cracked in the thirteenth, awash in his own blood, it was only after several rounds equally awash with a sense of inevitability.

    After beating the superb Ruben Castillo (47-1, and the “1” came against Alexis Arguello) in his first defense, Sanchez rematched Lopez and showed him a subtle difference—boxing more—and although it produced an almost identical result, it was telling. Sanchez was a thinking fighter; wary of showing a top-class opponent the same thing twice he re-developed the same strategy to present new problems. It was this kind of astonishing tactical awareness that brought him wins over Juan LaPorte, Wilfredo Gomez, Pat Cowdell and Azumah Nelson.

    Who knows what we in boxing lost when we lost Sanchez? He consistently showed the understanding and awareness of a veteran in his early twenties, a testimony perhaps to the number of fights and defenses he crammed into his short career. As a veteran, he might have attained the rare heights of strategic genius reserved for the likes of Archie Moore and Bernard Hopkins.
     
  7. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    I agree with all your comments on this thread.

    Talk at the time was about him taking on Arguello. The boxing press expressed that this would be as foolish on Sal's part as the notion of Alexis taking on SRL.

    Arguello routinely knocked out championship caliber opponents with body shots. Sanchez could certainly have been slowed down by those with the kind of anatomical precision placement El Flaco used.

    Pedroza, who Sanchez wouldn't even acknowledge, was really the biggest fight he had left within the division, until Gomez managed to rehabilitate his way into a rematch.

    What has to be looked at was who he had left at the time he died. Azumah Nelson was his eventual true successor of the WBC FW Crown, but he was well away from that when they actually squared off to unexpectedly end Sal's career.

    Rematches with former challengers who were competitive might have been in the offing, like immediate successor LaPorte. Like Danny Lopez and Pedroza, I don't think he'd have ever had trouble making 126.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol::twisted: that's a two-day ban mother****er.
     
  9. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,554
    3,755
    May 4, 2012
    :rofl





    This content is protected
    ??
     
  10. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Great fighter who may have had a couple of big fights more on the horizon.Probably ducked Pedroza, and would not have had sucess above Jr Lightweight, but, at the time of his death, probably top 5, 3 pound-per-pound.
     
  11. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    ?

    Gomez lost his featherweight title in the ring to Nelson.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,990
    48,070
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, but each man did not lose the title for which they are most noted, in the ring.
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Yeah, Sanchez feathweight and Gomez being super-bantamweight. :good