Sam Langford v Teddy Yarosz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Dec 27, 2014.


  1. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Mismatch or no?
     
  2. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Bump...it's a stretch to match Yarosz with an ATG like Langford...but any opinions on the forgotten great Yarosz?
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's interesting because the first post doesn't make it clear what you mean. Is it unfair to match an ATG with Yarosz, or is it unfair to match a "modern scientist" with a primitive boxer like Langford? It depends on who is making the thread, doesn't it?

    No, it's not unfair. Yarosz would arguably be the best middle that Langford ever beat. It depends, really, on where you drop him in Langford's timeline. He's obviously not going to beat the Langford that terrorised McVey and Jeanette, obvious to me anyway.
     
  4. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    I think Yarosz is being sold short here. The guy beat Tommy Freeman, Vince Dundee, Ben Jeby, Pete Latzo, Babe Risko, Ken Overlin, Solly Kreiger, Lou Broulliard, lost two nip/tuck fights to Conn one which most people thought he won (and beat him in a third bout), Archie Moore, Al Gainer, Nate Bolden, lost a controversial decision to Lloyd Marshall that most thought he won and came back to beat him. The guy was stopped only once in his entire career and that came from a knee injury, not a legit KO. Yarosz proved pretty conclusively that he could be competetive with anyone he was in the ring with when at his best.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yarosz is a great fighter. Yarosz is an ATG.
     
  6. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    I agree. Yarosz fought a 'who's who' in a very deep talent pool. I think around middleweight, Yarosz would give Langford a tough fight stylistically.
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    I concur...but don't you consider Langford? :lol:
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Did you mean Langford is an ATG?
    If so I can see the distinction,I suppose it depends on what stage of his career Langford is at?
    I don't know enough about Yarosz to comment, but I'll follow the thread and hopefully be informed as it goes along.
    Klompton's brief rundown on Yarosz shows him to have been a seriously dangerous guy.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Good post all around, I'm in the middle with how Langford would transition to modern era, I think his transition is much better than others of his era due to his physical talents.

    Let's not forget that just because Pacquaio can batter Margarito and Cotto doesn't mean he can beat Marquez. I don't think Langford encountered defensive footwork and lateral movement on the level of Yarosz.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    No.

    He obviously is though.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, I agree with this. In fact, he probably "translates" better than anyone who fought in he 1800s and I include Joe Gans in that statement.