Sam Langford vs Harry Greb

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, Jun 30, 2017.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    They can come in at anywhere below 175 and over 15 rds.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,859
    47,784
    Mar 21, 2007
    Listen, it's impossible to make a pick here and really believe you are right. It's fine to make a pick but there's no way to pick and feel good about it I don't think.

    Me, I alwas go for Langford because although both are spooky, Langford's a spooky puncher. But everything everyone writes in reposte will be true: Langford never did catch a fighter this fast, Greb wasn't ever knocked out near his prime, lesser fighters than Greb did make the distance with Langford. But, yeah, Langford.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,711
    29,041
    Jun 2, 2006
    Langford for me, but McGrain's point is well taken ,neither pick is wrong here.
     
    Mr.DagoWop likes this.
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Sam for me...
     
    Mr.DagoWop likes this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,533
    27,146
    Feb 15, 2006
    Langford, by about 53/47!
     
  6. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    551
    Feb 19, 2014
    Greb outworks him to a decision.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  7. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    If greb was a slightly bigger guy...greb....nobody beats greb p4p save Robinson....but even here greb by decision 54/46....
     
  8. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    Over 15 I'd could see Langford will figure him out and land something big eventually. Depending how longs it is after 15. If 20 Greb could outwork his way to a UD.
     
  9. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,007
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
  10. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,227
    6,480
    Jan 22, 2009
    One of the most unanswerable (is that a word, lol?) but provacative questions in boxing. Could Sam deal with Harry speed and workrate? Could Harry deal with Sams power and viciousness?
     
  11. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,227
    6,480
    Jan 22, 2009
    Sorry lads, im intoxicated. Probably delete thrse 2 tomorrow
     
    richdanahuff and McGrain like this.
  12. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    I like Langford by KO. Just too great of a fighter. I am reading a second bio of Sam right now call, "Pulling No Punches: The Sam Langford Story". I feel Sam was at his best when he weighed about 157 (from reading of his weights during fights in this book) and think he at that weight is the greatest middleweight that ever lived. Greb would not bewilder Sam, but I think Langford would hit too hard for Greb in their primes.
     
    juppity likes this.
  13. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    there is a reason so many ol fighters call Langford the best while Greb is left off a lot of lists and really was forgotten except by the hardcore fans. BTW there appears to be a new bio of Abe Attell coming out for those who love that era
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2017
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,222
    45,575
    Feb 11, 2005
    Today Greb, tomorrow probably Langford...
     
  15. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,742
    36,490
    Jul 24, 2004
    Let me review the online videos of Greb and I'll get back to you.
    Meanwhile, the video of Langford shows a nearly unbeatable boxer.
    Dude was amazing at any weight.