Sam langford vs joe Louis

You've said the underlined twice now would you like to provide the names of these experts and the dates when they made their picks please?

 

He was blinded by Fulton's left jab and he lost twice to Fulton because of it.

Marciano, Sharkey, Baer,Schmeling, Farr ,Simon etc all said Louis's jab was murder.

 

Braddock was heavyweight from 1931 until he retired in 1938.

He weighed:
194lbs for Baer
197lbs for Louis
199.5lbs for Farr

If he wasn't a heavyweight neither were.
Sullivan
Corbett
Fitz
Hart
Burns
Johnson
Dempsey
Tunney
Schmeling
Louis
Charles
Walcott
Marciano
Patterson
Johansson
Spinks
That's 16 heavyweight champions that weren't either since all of them weighed under 200lbs when they won the title.
You asked for our opinions , but when you didn't get the
answers you wanted from everyone ,you spat your dummy out.
End of.

 

I'm just beginning a bottle of Chateau Neuf Du Pape actually , and since you are newbie here, I'll explain how it works.

1.You make a statement.
2. You get called on it to provide primary sourced proof of it .
3.You provide it ,and your credibility is accepted.
4.You fail to provide it, and your credibility takes a walk.

Are we clear?

 

You need to read the fight reports.

 

If you couldn't care less about our opinions why have you asked for them?:huh


Your choice , just don't expect responses when you make any more unsupported statements and then excuse yourself for not providing proof of them by saying ,you don't want to spend Friday night reading about boxing when that is exactly what you are doing now!
Maybe this isn't the place for you?

Why not stay in the gym ,and keep looking in that mirror?

 

Sullivan was under 200lbs when he won the title.
You refuse to answer questions that directly impact on your unsupported statements.

 

Did Langford magically change his style when he suddenly reached his 34th birthday ?
Did he suddenly find he could no longer deal with jabs?