Sam Langford vs Marvin Hagler

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Theron, Jan 3, 2013.


  1. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    34
    Sep 2, 2012
    Middleweight 15 rounds >
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,898
    47,889
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'd give Hagler's chin the benefit of the doubt against 160lb Langford. Hagler points.
     
  3. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Don't recall Hagler whuppin' any light heavies or heavies like Sam did...just sayin'...



    Hagler points.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,574
    Sep 15, 2009
    As a mw fight I'm picking Hagler.

    Langford was nowhere near the force he would become as a hw.

    He was at his best as a 200 pound tank. I'm not even sold on his greatness as a lhw.
     
  5. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Like others at middle hagler on pts
     
  6. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,235
    2,430
    Mar 26, 2005
    Hagler by decision...
     
  7. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    Hmm surprised by the answers. not sure where i land but a near blind knocked out a green tiger flowers in 2 rounds (in georgia i believe). Not sure what he weighed but that, along with the ketchel result, give me reason to think langford has a decent shot
     
  8. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    Haglers greatness is blown way out of proportion
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,574
    Sep 15, 2009
    The ketchel fight was a low key 6 rounder that could have gone either way. It doesn't have an overt amount of relevance imo.
     
  10. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    true. but he was angling for a shot at the time and was handcuffed (ketchel wasn't going balls out either)

    just the fact that he was able to do that and knock out flowers makes me think he was extremely capable at 160.

    i'm skewed a little lighter with langford, i feel his best weight was probably 180-185
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,574
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah I'd he's capable but enough so to favour over a great like Hagler at the mw limit? I don't see it. His body of work in the division is nigh on non existant.

    I think he hit his stride as a genuine hw when he was the outstanding challenger to Johnson.

    I haven't checked his record for a while so I'm unsure what he weighed between 1911 and 1915. But the weight during that time is when I'd say he was at his best.
     
  12. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    Langford stops Hagler.
     
  13. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    if they both were at 160 i'll take hagler because sam wasn't at his best yet at that weight. sam overall is the greater fighter though.
     
  14. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    based on resume and body of work? bang on. and without footage we have little to go on but i just feel that the skills he had, and his demonstrated ability against fighters when he was coming up, we can extrapolate a bit

    if he could beat gans and "draw" with walcott when he was lighter and younger, than by 160 he could have the physical tools (read: ridiculous strength), timing and power to give hagler hell. he may not be nearly as complete as he would become but i give him a shot
     
  15. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I think he was pretty clearly at his best under 180.

    Langford by KO.