Sam Peter and poor or lack of dedication training claims

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bachatu, Oct 7, 2007.


  1. bachatu

    bachatu Pro Full Member

    4,779
    8
    Feb 25, 2006
    It seems like every post involving Peter, there is someone on there who states "his lack of dedication of training is starting to catch up". "He is lazy and needs to train"....
    Am I missing something here? Im trying to find out where everyone is getting that he doesnt train or he isnt dedicated to training? Those who have made that claim, please provide evidence or facts as to why he is not dedicated to training. Was there an article published stating that? Or did his trainer state his problem is in training? Im anxious to know since I read some many statements about his lack of training.
     
  2. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    He trained like hell and was as lean as he's ever been. That I"ve seen, anyway. They were bragging about how good his training camp went all the way up to this fight. His Iglosov clown, and Peter, and Duva, were all going on about how prepared and ready that Peter was.


    But him saying he fought with not one, but TWO broken hands............that''s kind of, well................
     
  3. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    He trained very hard and came in good shape - had he not, he would have been stopped in 3.
     
  4. Boinko

    Boinko Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    It's simple.

    If you like Peter, he wasn't physically prepared, he needs to find a better trainer, and McCline's power is underrated.

    If you don't like Peter, he's a fat, lazy fraud with a china chin.

    Remember this is the black and white world of ESB. There is no middle ground, no in between, and no "let's wait and see."