Sam Peter Article on Front Page

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Sep 11, 2007.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Where the **** does ESB come up with some of its writers?

    This is easily one of the worst articles on boxing I've ever seen.

    I'm not trying to be a dick, but damn.

    People actually read that **** and think that they've learned something.
     
  2. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,473
    2,078
    Nov 11, 2006
    Yeah, its the most biased, Peter hating **** i've ever seen, i was laughing the whole time i read it...:happy
     
  3. tragicliston

    tragicliston Active Member Full Member

    1,343
    0
    Dec 10, 2005
    I don't mind unpopular opinions, but that was just ****in' stupid. Every time ESB publishes on the those jokers the site's reputation goes down.
     
  4. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Exactly.

    Like when he said Ibriganov would control Peter using his jab.

    First of all, Ibriganov is a southpaw, secondly, his jab leaves a lot to be desired and honestly, he won't be able to do what he did against Briggs against Peter.

    His jab will come into play, but not nearly as much as his left hand and right hook.

    Either way, Peter stops Ibriganov.

    Even if I'm wrong, picking Povetkin, over Peter at this point in his career by an "EASY WIDE UD?"

    Come the **** on.
     
  5. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,473
    2,078
    Nov 11, 2006
    Peter would take Ibragimovs head off, before 8...
     
  6. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Also, "EASILY by a WIDE UD" is overused like a mother ****er on this forum.
     
  7. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    well, they allowed Jack Presscott to write an article so that opened the flood gates to all the rejects. But at the same time I think about half the guys he mentioned would beat Peter.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Wladimir Klitschko and Ruslan Chagaev are the two guys that I think would beat Samuel Peter. Other than that, I think he beats Oleg Maskaev, Sultan Ibragimov, Tony Thompson, Evander Holyfield, Sergei Lyakhovich, Lamon Brewster, Hasim Rahman, Alexander Povetkin, and Alexander Dimitrenko.
     
  9. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,473
    2,078
    Nov 11, 2006
    Same...I give Holyfield a better chance than half the people dude listed..
     
  10. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    He acts like everyone is Ali when he says, WIDE UD.

    When you got two guys the same height, stature, and similar fighting styles, there won't be a WIDE UD.

    BTW, Peter is gonna knock Maskaev out.
     
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Yes he will

    Overall, that was a terrible article
     
  12. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
    **** that was the worst piece of **** I've read all day
     
  13. iceman

    iceman Tis my Island Full Member

    4,899
    0
    Jul 4, 2006

    Is it even a serious article?
    How could anyone pick glass-jawed Rahman to beat Peter? effin hilarious:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  14. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    And what are those theories?:hey
     
  15. Doc BNB

    Doc BNB New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    Aug 12, 2006
    Those types of articles are the nature of the beast. This site has always been open to a wide range of content; if it's limited for the sake quality, then it also loses some of that open-market quality. Since all of the articles are open to comments, it's clear when some are given more criticism than others.