Sam Peter was right to quit, there was no way back for him so what exactly is the point of carrying on and risking permenant damage? VITALI is more of a quitter than SAM thats for sure.
Look at it this way, if what this idiot says is right and Peter has no chin, what does that say about VITLAYS punch power?
I disagree, they both have one quit on their records, so Peter and VITLAY are in fact equal quitters.
Vitali was calm and collected, Peter felt he would walk through Vitali and so did his corner with all the Brash Talk before the fight, However Peter got rocked in rd 1 and felt Vitali's power....He quit on the stool because he knew and Vitali knew he would be KO'd in a rd or 2.....He lost, had it and knew it...No shame...it just seems like Brewster vs Vlad, Sam knew a ko loss was inevitable so why get flattened...These Klitschko can beat you to death with the jab
Yes, Vitali is real good. Yes, Peter was done. Yes, Peter (along with all professional entertainers) does have to prove himself. Who buys the tickets and the PPVs? Who is targeted by the advertising that pays for everything in the sport that ain't live or PPV? Like it or not, the fans are the ones that pay the freight and the fighters must suffer their judgment. Accept the scorn as well as the accolades, each in their turn.