I wonder how many people here thik that FRAZIER would be able to hit PETER more often and HARDER then VLAD did ! Since they claim JOE stops him !:yep
I make fun of people who make claims without any thought ! FRAZIER doesnt match up well against PETER and its common boxing sence ! :deal
The difference is that Frazier throws more and goes to the body more. That has a great effect on fighters and can wear them down big time. Don't forget that McCline had Peter out on his feet.
I'll say it right now. Frazier lands more and harder punches on Peter than Wlad could EVER land. Frazier would get inside and destroy that fat belly of Peter. NO WAY Wlad outlands Joe Frazier. Wlad has ZERO inside game. Wlad doesn't ever go to the body EVER.
2hit4brains always picks current fighter over past fighters. That way he can buld Wald into the greatest ever. He's nothing but a hack...
atsch MCCLINE is 66 and 270 pounds ! JOE would be a small and vulnerable target as he was against BONAVINA ( who isnt in PETERS class ) and GEORGE ! JOE would get blasted ! :deal
But could Peter hit him? Frazier was very good defensively and if he could get inside on Peter, which I have no doubts that he would, he would do a lot of damage.
Why not explain it in a stylistic senSe then. Tell us WHY and base it on their past performances if you can. Give clear and concise examples to back your reasoning. This should be easy if it's common boxing senSe.
:smoke He would be crushed on the way in ! JOE was a total sucker for big looping hooks ! Check out youtube ! Joe doesnt match up well here !:deal
Go ahead and rip it. I DARE you to say WALD has a better inside fighting game compared to Joe Frazier.
I already did ! And when you must highlight the fact that i dont use spellcheck it makes my argument stronger ! :yep