Sam Peter vs. Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingGuru, Oct 17, 2007.


  1. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    Go to bed, you're losing your credibility here, as if you ever had any. You're right Sam Peter is the hardest puncher ever and he beats everyone who ever lived (except James Toney and Wlad Klitschko) and oh yeah he almost lost to one of the worst heavyweights ever to grace the top 10, Jameel McCline. But yeah you're right he beats the guy who beat Ali easily.
     
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    If it's so obvious, then PLEASE DO EXPLAIN, as it should be simple. This is now the second time I've asked and it's obvious you are really trying NOT to.

    If you can, site examples to back your reasoning. Show us all how smart you are and EXPLAIN why Peter wins. And no, citing youtube doesn't do the job.
     
  3. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    I love how 2smart4u is so smart for you that he can't even spell simple english words. I mean that is irony at the peak.
     
  4. Betty Swollocks

    Betty Swollocks James 'Lights Out' Toney Full Member

    5,709
    1
    Jul 21, 2004
    any heavyweight worth his salt would beat Peters, Frazier would smash him. I'ds give Peters's egg chin 2 rounds max against the left hook of Frazier. Sorry ass MCline has him teetering on the brink of KO :lol:
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    he's not 2smart4u, he's 2hit4brains (**** for brains)...:deal
     
  6. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    ..........fukin dumb.
     
  7. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    57
    Jul 20, 2004
    Peter would have a slight chance in the early rounds. Otherwise, Frazier was much faster, much more skilled, much better conditioned, much busier, and a much more effective offensive(and all-around) fighter. Frazier by KO 6.
     
  8. Decker

    Decker Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,451
    951
    Jul 7, 2007
    I posted a short comment re Peter vs JF in another thread. There are more fans here who overrate the past than ones that overrate the present. I also think that most big boxing fans tend to be from an older demographic - like myself. Classic boxing is not as popular (in the US) as it once was. Few will argue that. 2smart4u is just an aggressive poster who goes against the majority view. Sometimes the majority is wrong.

    I have neither hated on or hyped Peter. I think Frazier had very good talents coupled with top tenacity. I saw many of Fraziers fights. And BG what the hell is wrong with YouTube? Does it expose the greats from the past :yep Most of us don't own some big boxing vid library, and it helps our memories for those of us who saw these fights live decades ago.

    JF-Peter is an intriguing match up. I give Peter a good chance to win this one early to mid rounds. After that the advantage shifts to JF. At his peak Joe was a smallish 205# HW who'd be fighting a 250# Peter. Some act like Joe was some sort of slick stylist in there. :huh McCline does not punch his size, but he's a 270# HW. How many guys like that did JF fight? None. The older crowd in here are analyzing this with their hearts, not their brains. It's not that size is "everything" but the nostolgic brigade on ESB act like size is almost meaningless when debating the HWs.
     
  9. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    I think the 88 percentile speaks for itself here.
     
  10. El Bombasto

    El Bombasto Ask yo momma Full Member

    3,269
    2
    May 23, 2006
    Most people would, but based on what? Five title defenses?