Sam Soliman vs. Giovanni Lorenzo

Fenech called Mundine's trilogy with Soliman "a farce," :good

 

farce .. spot on... soloman might look a bit like nazem but he fights like a person having a seizure...( no offence to any1) i can understand 1 fight, possibly 2? maybe the ratings have been ok, but 3 common.....seriously??? its lester ellis all over again(put on show for the people take ur money) , just like danny green with briggs.... the promoters are robbing the fans of money its wrong and helping the fighter pad thier record...

 

Of course The Rolex Man V Nelson 111 was legit eh Gronk ?

You leap on any crumb to feed your obsession you sad little man. :hi:

 

Focus on the topic, Nelson v Fenech 3 hasnt got much to do with anything of what ive wrote or what others have wrote. Your love for Sammy is STRONG, write him a few love letters, go on get it over and done with, i know you wanna DO ET!

 

'' Soliman is a boxer who though ugly too watch at least has the balls to have a go when he is the mandatory challenger unlike Anthony Mundine who has ran from Kessler,Geale,Sturm and Trout''

Stiflers Mum

 

After Mundine-Soliman 2 it was but who put the rematch clause in the 2nd fight where they fought for the vacant title? I would bet it's Mundine. He is the money man and would have included it in case he lost.

 

Self explanatory...

 

Hold up Stiffy,I dont have a prob with his fighting style,ugly as **** to watch yes,but its served him well,he has fought all over the world,against some top guys,made some coin along the way...As more Mundine..his done well for himself