It was never seriously considered as a unification fight for some reason, but how do you see this one playing out? I'm a fan of Sanchez, as one might surmise, but I also like Pedroza, the filthy *******. I think Pedroza's slick style, coupled with his excellent stamina, poses real problems for Sanchez. Sanchez was always known as the guy who pulled away from his opponent in the championship rounds, but I don't know that we can say that here. In fact, I'm quite sure we can't say that. Sal does have the cleaner, more classical style, and more power, albeit marginally. Let's ponder......... Power: Edge- Sanchez Stamina: Push Movement: Push Jab: Sanchez Right hand: Sanchez Left Hook: Sanchez Body punching: Pedroza Ring generalship: Push Chin: Sanchez Lots of tangible things go Sanchez's way, but styles mean a lot, and Pedroza has what it takes to annoy the hell out of the more famous 126-pound titlist. I say Sal takes two of three decisions, in no particular order. All hotly contested.
And Drew comes rushing over to debate the topic in five...four...three....two.... Actually, I'm not quite as inclined to argue Pedroza's case as I once was, and I can certainly see Sanchez winning at least one in a three fight series. Nothing against El Alcran...I think I just appreciate the fighter Sanchez that much more these days. But, as to the debate itself... In terms of debating the tangible categories, the only category that I would really disagree with from Sal is the effectiveness of each man's jab. Chava had a good one, but Pedroza tended to utilize his more throughout the course of the fight, and I'd consider it to be more integral to his attack as a result. Push, at the very least. Might also add a couple of categories and see how the two compare... In terms of combination punching, I think it's just about even. Both guys put their punches together extremely well, so we're looking at a push here. In terms of defensive ability, the Panamanian was more elusive, and a bit harder to tag cleanly than his featherweight counterpart. Might be due to the nature of their styles (Sanchez usually was more aggressive), but in general I think Pedroza holds the edge, and that's something that needs to be taken into consideration in fights where more than one round would be won or lost on the basis of a single clean punch or two. So, all things considered, there just ain't that much between the two. At least two of the three fights would be extremely close and quitely likely bitterly disputed. I still think I'd favor Pedroza to take the first two, based on style match-up, with sanchez finally figuring him out in a third fight to secure a victory in the last contest. Either way, fans of the featherweights missed out on what would have been some high quality fights between two of the division's ATG's.
Drew, as I wrote the post, I envisioned our debate from the long-gone boxing site years ago and remembered it fondly. I knew you'd show up.
Sanchez was the more complete, more skilled fighter in my opinion..... Jab-Sanchez Hook-Sanchez Cross- Sanchez Uppercut-Pedroza Defensive skills- Offensive skills- Footwork- Sanchez Counter-Punches- Sanchez Power-Sanchez Speed- Sanchez Ring Generalship- Sanchez Combinations- Sanchez Feints- I don´t know Accuracy- Sanchez Timing- Sanchez Killer Instinct-Sanchez Body Punches-Pedroza Upper Body movement- Pedroza Chin- Sanchez Heart- Pedroza Stamina- Sanchez In-Fighting- Pedroza Range Fighting- Sanchez Opposition level- very close
IF Pedroza keeps it an outside-mid range technical fight for the bulk of the bout, his better jabbing and defence\slip and counter game should see him stay a step ahead for enough time to win a 3 to 5'ish point decision. sanchez would do his usual efficient take one jab or powershot aggressive counterpunching thing over the last third and with his chin and stamina might get the better of things there, but Pedroza was enough of a 15 rounds pacing master himself not to allow himself to get overhauled too much.
Sanchez was more dynamic, but Pedroza would give him a helluva fight imo. He's an ATG featherweight. Pedroza out performed him against Ford. Now, common opponents don't mean much, but Pedroza was better than both Ford and Cowdell. Who Sanchez slightly struggled with. I think Sanchez would win a decision. His feet were too educated for Pedroza. He would side step and slide around him.
I see it panning out in a similar fashion to what you do. A trilogy of fights between these two would have ensued.
No matter how much we analyze and discuss this matchup, I can never come to a conclusion as to what would happen. I can see Sanchez's greater energy, workrate and youth pulling through just as easily as I can Pedroza's experience, pacing, and overall ring generalship. I honestly cannot pick a winner. Sanchez struggling with Patrick Ford, I well remember, as well as Pedroza easily defeateding him. On the flip side, I'd have a hard time seeing Pedroza do the demolition job on Bazooka Gomez that Sanchez did though. Again, hard to rate and I appreciate the thoughtful posts.
I'm not convinced about Pedroza not handling Gomez. I definately think he has the experience/chin/conditioning to force that Gomez parachute to open the second half of the fight. He may not hurt him early like Sanchez did, but Sal sure let that guy hang around quite a few rounds after almost getting him out of there in the first. He played it smart and safe and drowned him, as opposed to a demolition job. A demolition job see's a 2nd round ko result, but Sanchez didn't fight that way. And Pedroza did the same thing. That's what Wilfredo really needs anyway--windows and opportunities and Sal Sanchez and Eusabio Pedroza did not give them.