Sandy Saddler v Azumah Nelson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Nov 23, 2010.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,177
    8,672
    Jul 17, 2009
    Who wins this hypothetical classic ?
     
  2. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    saddler sometime after the 10th by stoppage
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Nelson, even stronger and as good inside while being more athletic and better outside
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Saddler for me.
     
  5. perko

    perko Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    7
    Nov 3, 2010
    saddler beats the professor.
     
  6. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    The same Nelson who was beaten and outmuscled inside by a natural Bantam is at no disadvantage against Saddler?
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    PP doesn´t rank Saddler higher, I think that´s where it comes from.


    I think this would be a good, action-packed fight. Saddler, I think, would just be a tad better in everything than Azumah.
     
  8. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Nelson is an absolute God of the ring. One of the greats of the past 30 years who did it all.

    In Saddler we are talking about arguably the greatest ever featherweight. I’m not sure I’d back any featherweight to beat him in a one-off. Not Pep, Chocolate, Armstrong or Sanchez… His dimensions, power, chin and rough house tactics make him one of the most unwelcome opponents at any weight.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Wasnt Nelson was recovering from malaria?
     
  10. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,498
    7,267
    May 18, 2006
    Fenech was a natural Bantam like Toney was a natural Middleweight.

    Fenech only had about a dozen fights at 118 and near had to kill himself to make weight every time.
     
  11. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,694
    2,567
    Oct 18, 2004
    Nelson would stop Saddler in eleven rounds, figuring out Sandy after about three rounds.
     
  12. MURK20

    MURK20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,520
    1,344
    Sep 26, 2008
    I never saw Saddler on film. I heard he was super rough. On the other hand I'm a big Nelson fan and Saddler would have to prove me wrong. Nelson late stoppage.
     
  13. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    I see a close decision. Azumah may go onto win a rematch, he was more clever and strong & tough enough not to get completely overwhelmed in close by Saddler.
     
  14. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,456
    Jan 6, 2007
    Saddler appears to be a natural Jr Lightweight, not FW. Not sure what weight this Nelson fight is proposed at. Numerous Saddler fights involved fouls and low blows. But Saddler can be beaten, in that his record has losses..but the fight descriptions are spotty. Going with Nelson by close decision.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,904
    44,701
    Apr 27, 2005
    No-one would beat Saddler comfortably at his 126 pound best. Azumah is great but Saddler has him covered easily on the power front. There's a reason he is ranked 5th in the Ring's 100 Greatest Punchers of All-Time edition.