Santos Saúl Álvarez Barragán vs. Daniel Jacobs & John Ryder vs. Bilal Akkawy RBR

I scored absolutely objective although i don't like him. I don't relate on that while watching a fight. I relate on what happens in the ring. I did say that i have no problem with 115-113 Clenelo here, even 116-112 Clenelo is a okay scorecard. I also said i think the second GGG fight was no robbery. I am not a blind hater.

And....

CLENelo

and

Mexican drug cheat

are just FACTS.

He's a drug cheat. And he's from Mexico.

 

He said 115-113 to Alvarez was also fine? Which is what two judges scored it, Jesus.

 

Neither guy really did much, to truly separate themselves from the other. Canelo as usual, looked super flashy with his flamboyant punches and movement but at no point did he look close to stunning, dropping or KO'ing Daniel Jacobs.

Meanwhile, Daniel Jacobs landed a few punches which truly hurt and stunned Canelo for brief moments!

Otherwise, I couldn't find anything else from either guy that truly proved they were definitively above the other.

Being flashier and more flamboyant doesn't prove you're superior than the less flashier guy or that you have the edge. Since boxing isn't a gymnastic or dancing contest. It's about damaging the other guy through effective punches. And in that department, it was a stalemate as neither Canelo or Jacobs (outside of one or two punches when he briefly stunned Canelo) was able to inflict greater damage.

Also, Canelo looked very sloppy as well, missing punches all over the place, looking like his accuracy was nonexistent. Just before people start talking about how elusive Canelo was and how much Jacobs missed. As it works both ways!

 

That little fangirl didn't read that. He only read the words "Clenelo" and "Mexican drug cheat" because i harmed his prince ginger.

 

Fair enough.

 

Draw is solid result here. I had it 115-113 Jacobs but i can see range of scores from 116-112 Clenbuterol to 115-113 Jacobs for sure. Good fight, good cards in the end and i was right that there won't be **** cards like 118-110 in the end like in the first GGG fight.

 

Don't go all beetch on me. I gave you credit.

But you have to understand how dubious your scoring looks when you start your post by being totally negative about the fighter you had losing.

 

At least it’s easier to separate the blind homers from the objective fans of the sport.

 

I don't think there is any dubious thing about my scoring posting.

1. I scored it 115-113 Jacobs like @CST80 (and i picked Clenelo by UD in the league btw)
2. I wrote 115-113 Clenelo is a good scorecard aswell as Canelo might edged a few close rounds i gave to Jacobs with coming forward, sharp counters and good jab work

I think you're on of the bigger Clenelo fanboys in here....at least i remember that

 

Ditto.

As an ardent Canelo hater I hope your post wasn't lost on you. LOL

 

That's just more proof that you DKSAB.