Saul "Canelo" Alvarez and his HATERS

Saul "Canelo" Alvarez, the hate he gets is ridiculous...Especially when you consider all the LOVE Cotto gets.

I don't understand how Cotto gets overrated, while Canelo gets hated on...I'll explain why I think it's out of Envy or ignorance the hate I see Alvarez receiving on ESB by comparing these two Jr. MW.

So Cotto started his pro career at Welter Weight and then shrunk himself down to Jr.WW after having a succesful and lengthy Amateur career.

Leading up to his world title fight he fought some decent contenders in Maussa and Sosa, even a very close fight with Lovemore N'dou, a fight that proved Cotto to have problems finishing strong.

He won his first Title (the VACANT WBO jr.ww) against Kelso Pinto, a contender, nothing more, maybe less. After his fight with Pinto, he fought hard hitting but nothing special Bailey whose last 6 fights before fighting Cotto was 3/3. Following the Bailey fight he fough shot contender Corley who Cotto outweighed by 17 pounds on fight night and was hurt worse than what Jose Cotto hurt Alvarez.

Then he fought Abdulleav. Torres, Branco, and malignaggi.

That's 7 C and B level fighters at most after he won his vacant WBO title at 140 at the age of 24.

Now a lot of you guys hate on Canelo because at the age of a whopping 21 he holds a title, and won it against M. Hatton a more legit guy than Pinto, and since has fought Rhodes, Alfonso Gomez, and Kermit Cintron in his first year with that Title, and theres already talks about him fighting Kirkland, Mosley and he would fight Cotto if they could make the fight.

Cotto fought Bailey, Corley, and Abdulleav in his first year after picking up his first strap.

IMO, Alavarez has taken more chances at his age and his time with a title than Cotto.

Haters gonna hate.

 

Bull****. Read the ****ing post.

Cotto fought for the ****ing WBO Jr.WW strap that was VACANT against Kelso ****ing Pinto!

Then he defended it against Bailey, Corley and Abdulleav in his first year as a titlist at the age of 24 and 25....

...While the 21 year old red head won it against Matthew Hatton and defended against Rhodes, Alfonso Gomez and Kermit Cintron.

Canelo's reign is off to a more legit start than Cotto's, and at a younger age.

 

You a hater...You have Cotto's balls in your mouth, yet Canelo's start as a titlist is similar too Cotto's if not slightly better...

Why don't you want to see redhead get props?

 

Wait are you serious?atsch

 

He's hyped up to be the next great thing...It's what good promoters do for their fighters...:roll:

He practically had no Amateur career, of course he's going to fight a lot of weaker opponents to help him get refined...What the **** do you expect moron? For him to go pro and be this ****ing Ray Robinson off the bat??!!

And btw, Cotto fought a nobody for his Vacant WBO title.

atsch

So what?

Oh, I see...You're a *****. :|

Ok.

I see, you only like the highest Calibre fighters...GTFO if you don't enjoy boxing.

Most succesful pro fighters come into the pro scene with over 100 amateur fights.

 

I'm not thrilled that he is a titlist, but that's not the point. My point is that he gets so much hate when there's fighters like Cotto who at his age had a similar begining yet get so much props and love or fighters much more protected...

What does Cotto have to do with anything? People seem to compare them, and I'm just making a comparison with the double standard being used against the Mexican fighter.

He was given a title too soon, but so far, he's defended it against better oposition than many titlist.