Saunders beats Canelo with loads to spare.

Trout and Lara maybe but that was years ago when his profile was much lower. Jacobs was a good fight for Ginger given Jacobs ran GGG so close and at the time anyway was clear 3rd best mw. Now Ginger can pick his fights. Just don't see why he'd fight BJS .

 

I haven’t seen the fight yet but I can totally see him pulling a move like that, he’s sharp as a dart just like fury.
And he did it on that YouTube card, imagine bjs moving over to matchroom and being on the undercard of two youtubers and taking it without saying anything, I like your way of thinking mate. The travelling community get labelled many things but the one thing no one can argue with is that they more often than not one step ahead.

 

He defo needs a big win for Canelo to entertain him, right now it really is a pointless fight for him

 

the guy is a mong, im surprised he can tie his own shoes. just listen to this idiot, then have a serious talk with yourself.

This content is protected

 

Whoa I definitely don’t like the lad and I think he makes some bad decisions like hanging about with kid Galahad, and that thing with the junkie was bad taste but I can definitely see him pulling one like CST80 said, and after thinking about it, the loud mouth he is why would he move over to matchroom and be on the undercard of that fight and not say anything? It just wouldn’t happen, he must have a plan.

 

Billy is far too young for canelo, it's still five years away.

 

Saunders is all wrong for Canelo. Canelo struggles against slick boxer types.

 

He does indeed beat Canelo.

BJS suffers from the same disease Fury does..boredom. Usually there's a power-saving mode on devices, BJS and Fury have that same mode and they turn it on when they fight bums. It's typical gypsy behaviour. They don't care, because a fight against bums like this is a stroll in the park for them.

And just like Fury lured Wilder into a fight by looking bang average in his build-up fights, BJS will play the same game for Canelo and GGG.

You can't ignore the Lemieux fight. You can't just sweep it aside and act like it didn't happen. Lemieux barely hit him. Why? Because BJS decided to turn up the settings a bit.

Gypsies play boxing, they don't give a toss. Nothing fazes them. And that's why the fight against Coceres was an act. BJS CHOSE to end it. This was all a mousetrap for Canelo.

 

did you watch the video? did you listen to what he said? are you so inexperienced that you cant tell someones sincerity when youre staring them in the face?
the honest truth, im embarrassed for you 2 guys, seriously. this speaks of serious coping deficiencies. i sincerely hope you 2 are just really good trolls.

 

If he trains like **** and gives it 100%, he can dance his way round Canelo for the UD. That failed test massively ****ed his momentum up though, he'd of beat Andrade by now and be in a better position

 

Completely agree with that, why would Canelo want to fight bjs? Anyone who’s been the sport long enough will surely know the styles that they have the most difficulties with and Canelo must surely know that bjs is all wrong for him. Even when they were both at middleweight bjs had the WBO it wasn’t like bjs was fighting all the top lads(some say he was ducked some say he was ducking) but he wasn’t in enough top fights to really make the case for ggg

i said I hadn’t seen it mate, but that I can completely see him doing something like that, and normally I wouldn’t form an opinion without watching the fight but the fight only has so much relevance in this case. It’s more the way he accepted been on the undercard of the YouTube lads after just leaving Queensbury for matchroom to get the big fights, and that would be fine, but bjs would definitely have something to say about it and he didn’t to me that is completely out of character, isn’t it? Iam not certain by any means but it’s a theory that fills the gap until a better one comes along.

 

why must there be a theory? every single incident in bjs career ties in perfectly with every other incident. hes been telling you exactly who he is for a very long time. the mere fact that you have to formulate theories for every single incident that flies in the face of your argument, is proof positive of where the truth lies.