Saunders vs Eubanks

Did anyone think either of them were before this fight??

 

GGG would KO them both within 6,no doubt

 

Close enough to go either way imo so no robbery. Split decision in favour of Saunders sounds about right.

 

just checked, no i'm fine thanks.

you cant even respond to what i'm saying because you know you're beaten.

it was a tough, close fight for bjs. if you don't believe me go ask him.

furthermore book a visit to the optometrist, he needs to thicken your coke bottle lenses even further cause clearly you cant see ****

 

BJS clearly won

 

your pathetic. Wait...your the guy who believed Calzaghe could beat Joe Louis atsch

 

BJS won that fight, barely, by one round and he wasn't far from being stopped.

 

When was that then ?

You should share whatever it is your smoking.

 

Fair result. It came down to BJS a winning the first 6 rounds. Although saying that Eubank looked the far more dangerous fighter and had a great 9th round. Thought BJS might have went on to be stopped but the tiredness and ecxessive wild punching of Eubank took its toll and he looked spent in the last couple.

Side notes: the ref was ****ing me off and the bias of the commentary towards BJS a was annoying to listen to.

 

totally agreed

 

Best lesson Eubank Jnr will receive in boxing. No posturing/posing soon as that bell rings you get down to business and fight. A mixture of nervous energy and freezing as he'd never been in with a well schooled jabber saw him lose those first five rounds. However once he realised that he was in the proverbial **** he bit on his gumshield and got close and fought like we know he can.
He should be his own man, he will never be like his dad and he also needs to mature and listen to trainers. His own naivety cost him the fight, it's shame because he was close to stopping BJS.

 

7-5 and that was because Eubank started slowly.

BJS would have got stopped had the fight carried on or if Eubank had started earlier