After seeing the second ifght KO first and everyone talking about that, I went back and saw the first. And roy completly dominated him. I had the scorecards 9-3. Aside from short bursts of hitting Roy Maybe for 10 seconds with some clean punches but they weren't even that good, Roy would beat Tarver and make tarver do whatever he wanted for the other 2:30 seconds per round. Why was there even a rematch? was there a rematch clause?
Got to remember RJJ had lost like 5 of his last 110 rounds and cleaned out the division. Winning 3 rounds in this situation made Tarver RJJs clear would be successor. Harding had also won 3 rounds against RJJ and Tarver had beat him.
It was a 7-5 fight. Tarver had the better work and was the aggressor, but deserved the loss fo not throwing enough.
I had it quite close with Jones pulling it out in the end. There was a rematch as, at the time, Jones was seen as pretty much untouchable and had never really been in a close fight. As it was, Tarver 1 saw the last remains of the old Roy Jones - and the last time we saw him still operating at elite level. I think, because of the way the trilogy unfolded, people often forget that he gutted it out in this one ie he beat Tarver and he did it while on the decline - a decline that would continue and was precipitous. It's a pity he did not see the writing on the wall and retire at this point.
what work? Just hitting a guy for 30 seconds and landing maybe 1 clean shot in a 3 minute round doesn't net you a round when the other guy does whatever he wants. I had it 9-3. Roy gave ihm a round literally because he was tired. the first 2 might have been tarvers ( gave him only the 2nd) but the rest, Roy was in the center of the ring and tarver didn't punch at all for several rounds
I’m sure your fringe scorecard is worth more than the majority decision that the judges handed in and the rematch was therefore pointless.
Roy's problem imo was just he wanted ot keep showing how great he was. Like he had something to prove which he didn't Before he went to heavyweight he was already a legend in 47-1 and an all time great light-heavyweight. Had nothing left to prove and no oen really asked him to prove more. But he is gonan decide to go and become a heavyweight champion. Which again, added to his legacy which was pointless because he was already great but now he is greater. Then he goes back down again to become light heavyweight champion ,for some reason which again, he already was a legend so it was pointless. It is like with Ali, he had nothing left to prove after he beat George
Only watched it once amd had it something like 8-4 for Jones. Nothing that would normally warrant an immediate rematch, but just the fact that Jones was in a competitive fight was enough considering how dominant he'd been up to that point.
I had Jones by two, but he looked awful. Considering hoe dominant he’d been going into that fight, the fact that it was close on the cards raised more than a few eyebrows.
True. Part of the problem was that he mismanaged his money too. Hence all the late career fights and the losses that came with them
It was a fair decision. Tarver lost too many rounds by spending so much time in the middle of the ring, doing little, perhaps hurt or leery from Roy’s body shots. 7-5 Jones is fair