Saw Roy Jones Jr vs Antonio Tarver 1 for the first time and wasn't what I thought it was.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by NewChallenger, Mar 21, 2026.


  1. NewChallenger

    NewChallenger Active Member Full Member

    678
    720
    Oct 17, 2020
    After seeing the second ifght KO first and everyone talking about that, I went back and saw the first.

    And roy completly dominated him. I had the scorecards 9-3. Aside from short bursts of hitting Roy Maybe for 10 seconds with some clean punches but they weren't even that good, Roy would beat Tarver and make tarver do whatever he wanted for the other 2:30 seconds per round.

    Why was there even a rematch? was there a rematch clause?
     
  2. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,123
    6,178
    Jan 6, 2024
    Got to remember RJJ had lost like 5 of his last 110 rounds and cleaned out the division. Winning 3 rounds in this situation made Tarver RJJs clear would be successor. Harding had also won 3 rounds against RJJ and Tarver had beat him.
     
    Smoochie and NewChallenger like this.
  3. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,922
    4,680
    Jul 14, 2009
    close fight, no domination. Roy pulled it out in the later rounds.
     
  4. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,610
    20,149
    Apr 3, 2012
    It was a 7-5 fight. Tarver had the better work and was the aggressor, but deserved the loss fo not throwing enough.
     
    Terror likes this.
  5. KO_King

    KO_King Horizontal Heavyweight Full Member

    934
    2,010
    Apr 16, 2023
    I had it quite close with Jones pulling it out in the end. There was a rematch as, at the time, Jones was seen as pretty much untouchable and had never really been in a close fight. As it was, Tarver 1 saw the last remains of the old Roy Jones - and the last time we saw him still operating at elite level. I think, because of the way the trilogy unfolded, people often forget that he gutted it out in this one ie he beat Tarver and he did it while on the decline - a decline that would continue and was precipitous. It's a pity he did not see the writing on the wall and retire at this point.
     
    Smokin Bert, Smoochie and Overhand94 like this.
  6. NewChallenger

    NewChallenger Active Member Full Member

    678
    720
    Oct 17, 2020
    what work? Just hitting a guy for 30 seconds and landing maybe 1 clean shot in a 3 minute round doesn't net you a round when the other guy does whatever he wants.
    I had it 9-3.
    Roy gave ihm a round literally because he was tired.
    the first 2 might have been tarvers ( gave him only the 2nd) but the rest, Roy was in the center of the ring and tarver didn't punch at all for several rounds
     
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,610
    20,149
    Apr 3, 2012
    I’m sure your fringe scorecard is worth more than the majority decision that the judges handed in and the rematch was therefore pointless.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,196
    27,667
    Jan 3, 2007
    I had Jones winning that one too. I really wish he had retired after that
     
    KO_King and Greg Price99 like this.
  9. NewChallenger

    NewChallenger Active Member Full Member

    678
    720
    Oct 17, 2020
    Roy's problem imo was just he wanted ot keep showing how great he was. Like he had something to prove which he didn't

    Before he went to heavyweight he was already a legend in 47-1 and an all time great light-heavyweight. Had nothing left to prove and no oen really asked him to prove more.
    But he is gonan decide to go and become a heavyweight champion. Which again, added to his legacy which was pointless because he was already great but now he is greater.
    Then he goes back down again to become light heavyweight champion ,for some reason which again, he already was a legend so it was pointless.

    It is like with Ali, he had nothing left to prove after he beat George
     
    Smokin Bert and Overhand94 like this.
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,670
    14,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    Only watched it once amd had it something like 8-4 for Jones. Nothing that would normally warrant an immediate rematch, but just the fact that Jones was in a competitive fight was enough considering how dominant he'd been up to that point.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2026
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  11. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,993
    11,869
    Aug 22, 2004
    I had Jones by two, but he looked awful. Considering hoe dominant he’d been going into that fight, the fact that it was close on the cards raised more than a few eyebrows.
     
    slash likes this.
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,196
    27,667
    Jan 3, 2007
    True. Part of the problem was that he mismanaged his money too. Hence all the late career fights and the losses that came with them
     
    NewChallenger likes this.
  13. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,666
    Jun 30, 2005
    It was a fair decision. Tarver lost too many rounds by spending so much time in the middle of the ring, doing little, perhaps hurt or leery from Roy’s body shots.

    7-5 Jones is fair