Say what you want about David Haye..but

Dimitrenko is awful. Beating him counts for nothing. Pulev has beaten noone proven.

Fury is equally unproven, unpolished, clumsy, poorly conditioned, poor technically and he would not go the full distance with Vitali, Wlad, Haye or a WELL CONDITIONED Chisora.

If you even make a serious argument for either being better you are a clown and I will gladly lifetime avatar bet you one one of them steps up to get sparked into the stone ages

 

I can answer. Chisora beat Robert Helenius which is the reason he got a shot against Vitali. OK Junior? You understand?
And Chisora tried to win his title fight against Klitschko. He also looked decent against Tyson Fury. Haye needed 3 rounds to KO Audley the bum with a glass chin. He needed 5 rounds to beat C level fighter Barrett. 10 rounds to beat old fat shot Ruiz who hasn't been good in 5 years. And then Haye went the distance with pillow hands,slow fat Valuev. Haye doesn't even throw combos that he brags about. He is a one punch stalker. The only thing fast about him is how fast he runs away.
Should I be any clearer you ****ing child? Do I need to verbally ***** slap you any further? You're a joke bro and you're verbal pseudo- attacks are the caliber of an 11 year old boy. I just made you my ***** and I hope you swallow.

 

Pulev is better than Haye and Haye would get raped against Pulev. Pulev beat a top ten fighter and Haye beat a top 200 fighter.
I dont know what lifetime avatar bet is,I'm a man and I dont do corny **** like that.

 

nonsense man, how can you compare a world title fight with a victory over mcdermott. hate is definitely the 3rd best hw in the division.