Schaefer explains reason for Peterson/Matthysse catch weight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stylez G., Apr 11, 2013.


  1. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    "It's really interesting. Both fighters wanted to fight for both belts, so there was no issue there. The IBF said that they do not recognize unification bouts with interim-belts. Then the approach was for Lamont to only defend his belt, or for Matthysse to only defend his belt - that was one possibility. Or have the IBF rule that they can fight for both belts and then the winner would have to decide within a week which belt he will keep. All of that was not acceptable. So we really had a choice of not doing the fight because of that or to do the fight and make it a non-title fight,"

    So basically, he blames the IBF. If he's to believed here, someone would've had to vacate or they had to do it at as a non title fight. I'd like to hear a statement from the IBF on this.
     
  2. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,987
    2
    Jul 24, 2011
    -no Schaefer you have to blame PEDerson
    -people wont watch the fight now since belts are not on the line the fight now sucks
     
  3. Box702

    Box702 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,576
    0
    Oct 23, 2012
    & ppl tried to blame matthysse smh.
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    I kinda get where they're coming from. IBF doesn't want to unify with an interim belt. I think they should go ahead and do it anyways since the winner will be fighting for the real WBC belt next.
     
  5. Sweet-D-Willy

    Sweet-D-Willy Tha Realest Full Member

    8,474
    4
    Jan 23, 2013
    fair enough..
    Interims aint **** anyway..
     
  6. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    Who cares about the belts they are meaningless it's about the fighters status increasing with the victory.
     
  7. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    no most people were blaming Peterson. The source I heard from talked directly to the IBF and said Matthysse didn't want to wager his title which is in fact true, but telling only half the story.
     
  8. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Everyone was saying matthysse but like I said it was not him..
     
  9. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    i luv my wbc interim belt :roll:
     
  10. Withwhatsmine

    Withwhatsmine Boxing Addict banned

    5,520
    1
    Jan 10, 2013
    What should be the fight of the year and they are trying hard to ruin it, this really shows peoples bias.
     
  11. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,054
    35,312
    Apr 17, 2011
    I am pretty certain that if he gives up that belt he loses his mandatory spot.
     
  12. JDezi4

    JDezi4 Guest

    Belts don't mean ****, they haven't for years

    Danny Garcia has the only belt that matters (and even that one is pretty much a joke)
     
  13. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    I don't understand why Lucas wants to hold on to a interim title, when he could simply just fight and get the belt from Lamont.
     
  14. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,054
    35,312
    Apr 17, 2011
    He wants Garcias sweet ass :hey
     
  15. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    good point....if lucas has interim, he will force garcia to either vacate or defend.