Predrag Aleksic 112-116 | judge: Herminio Cuevas Collazo 111-117 | judge: Tom Kaczmarek 110-118 I would agree with the first judge but do you guys think it was as wide as the other two are saying? I thought it was close
I agree, Froch won that clearly but it wasn't a shut out at all, Pascal clearly won around 4-5 rounds
Don't tempt those "hometown decision" fools to start their nonsense in here. Froch won this fight clearly by at least 5 rounds and deserved to win the title.
the scorecards were mega wide tho Froch won 116-112 sounds about right. Froch found a another gear late on but which ever muppet gave him 118 needs a slap
I actually had it even the last time I scored it. On the night I felt Froch had just edged it about 115-113. I just thought Pascal was whipping him in the first half of the fight; it was Froch's work-rate that killed him in the second half of the fight where he took over.
When have you ever agreed with all scorecards in a fight? Judging is subjective. If there are close rounds in a fight then it will be relected by discrepancies in the scorecards. Nothing new here.
When I watched it live I scored it for Pascal. I remember Pascal would outbox Froch a majority of a round but get hit with a shot that would stagger him. Many seem to just give Froch the round because of that only, similiar to the Cunningham/Adamek fight but without KDs.
i had it 8-4 or 9-3, but it was competetive all the way through, pascal was just too passive in the first halfs of later rounds.
Froch deserved the win, if I remember rightly, I had Froch winning the early and latter rounds with Pascal picking up the majority of the middle rounds. To those who scored it for Pascal, fair enough it's your opinion, but do you not think Pascal's work rate let him down from about round 6-7? (like I said before though, if I remember rightly)
It was a good competetive fight, but there is no way at all that Pascal won. Some of the cards were too wide, but Froch clearly won.