Scorecards please!

It all started going downhill when you said "non biased perspective" and never fully recovered after that!

 

Pac clearly won get over it

 

I'll get over it as soon as you make up you mind about whether or not Pac won "clearly", as neither your scoring nor the judge's agree with that statement:deal

 

the rounds were quite clear to score, how you could ever conjur up a theory that pac could of possoibly won 116-111 is simply beyond me.

 

I already told you pac clearly won, what part you didnt understand.

Its you idiots giving every ****ing close round to Marquez in the entire fight who are bitching Marquez was robbed.

 

1 JMM
2 JMM
3 Pac-man 10-8
4 Pac-man
5 JMM
6 JMM
7 Pac-man
8 JMM
9 Pac-man
10 Pac-man
11 JMM
12 JMM

Thought JMM deserved the nod, 114-113.

 

114-113 is NOT a clear victory dip****.

Cause if it is then you should have no problem with those claiming robbery when their scores were something like 115-112 for Marquez.:deal

 

same scorecard as me mate but I gave the 1st round to pacman, it totally pissed me off that pacman landed 3 great lefts compared to JMMs one right but HBO only replayed Jmm's one right hand highlight.

 

its dumb****s like you why the word robbery isnt even a legitimate term anymore in this sport, you use it everytime your favorite fighter ofrthe fighter you want to lose fight an extremely close fight that could be called either way and gets the verdict you do now want to see.

 

I rewatched it; last time I had it 114-113 for JMM; this time, this is my scorecard:

R1: draw
R2: Marquez
R3: Pacquiao 10-8
R4: draw
R5: Marquez
R6: Marquez
R7: Marquez
R8: Marquez
R9: Marquez
R10: Paquiao
R11: draw
R12: Marquez

Total: Marquez 114-110; even if I give the "draw" rounds to Pacquiao, I have it: Marquez 114-113 :conf

I thought Pacquiao won their first fight; I'm giving the second to Marquez. I think Marquez would beat Manny at 135 too - he would do better at th higer weight than Manny, who is naturally smaller. Bulking up would increase the chance of Manny scoring a KD but would decrease the chance of him outboxing Juan Manuel. On the whole, I think JMM would beat Pacman at 135.

So...I've changed my mind...I want to see JMM v. Guzman at 130; I don't want to see JMM v. Pacman III.

 

I see what you did there

 

Wrong again shitface, quote me one time saying this was a robbery!:deal

 

Then why the **** is your ***** bleeding about the subject then. If you dont think its a robbery then STFU.

 

You're the one who has been posting your inconsistencies from the get go, I'm just here to point out what an ass your'e making of yourself:hi:

 

fixed!:good