Scoring even rounds?

Thats the right way to do it.:good

 

Even rounds are complete bull in my honest opinion. I can't ever see how you have a completely even round. It doesn't matter if somebody wins by a razor thin margin, thats why there is 12 rounds.

 

I really don't get this mentality that judges scoring a round even is somehow weak and indecisive. You are making a decision to score a round even. To me that makes far more sense if a round is close. Who wants to see a fight decided by the most subjective and undecisive rounds?

Take a 12 round fight with one guy winning 4 rounds decisively, the other guy winning no rounds decisively and 8 close rounds. If the judges give the close rounds to the guy who won no rounds decisively he wins the fight. Does that really make sense?

 

Yes it makes sense if he's won 8 rounds to his opponents 4.

 

No no i get what youre zzzzzzzzzzzzaying i just think its wrong :good

Already answered that before you pointed that nonsense, a close round still dont mean its even atsch if its close by definition means theres a winner however small the margin its still a win. Same as over the fight, by your logic a close win is a draw atschatsch As i stated the only time a 10-10 is logical is if noone lands at all or if all aspects on judging are level and that sooooooooooo rarely happens. Can forgive people who let the odd one go but not your logic allowing loads of rounds 10-10 coz its simply not possible and you must be missing loads.

By the way people have argued either side of this, its lame to pick 1 post and 'thank' them for having the same opinion as u

 

That's why there's more than one judge. One of the reasons anyway.