Scoring Loma's Losses

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10
7: 10-9

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10
7: 10-9
8: 10-9
9: 10-9

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10
7: 10-9
8: 10-9
9: 10-9
10: 10-9

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10
7: 10-9
8: 10-9
9: 10-9
10: 10-9
11: 10-9

 

Lomachenko Vs Lopez

1: 9-10
2: 9-10
3: 9-10
4: 9-10
5: 9-10
6: 9-10
7: 10-9
8: 10-9
9: 10-9
10: 10-9
11: 10-9
12: 9-10

113-115

I see a weak argument for Lomachenko winning, if you give him rounds 2 and 12.

I see a stronger argument for a draw if you give Loma one of those 2 rounds.

But all in all I think this is a fair result. Loma was very ineffective in the first half of the fight and was frustratingly inactive.

 

Haney Vs Lomachenko

1: 9-10
2: 10-9
3: 9-10
4: 10-9
5: 9-10
6: 10-9
7: 9-10
8: 10-9
9: 9-10
10: 9-10
11: 9-10
12: 10-9

113-115

This should have been Lomachenko's redemption for the Lopez loss. It would have regained his spot as LW champion and would have made him a 4 belt champion.

Lomachenko could have then reigned as champion maybe being tempted to move up for the Lopez rematch at some point.

I think there's a reasonable argument for Haney getting the victory here, but it's a cruel decision.

 

November 18th I started this thread.

Since then I've decided all 3 losses could easily be scored as 3 losses, 3 draws, 3 wins or anything in-between.

For me the right result is Loma going 2-1 with his loss being to Lopez, and looking at the poll results, that's the most selected answer, even though it's still a minority result.

I can't, in good conscience, hold the Salido or Haney results against Lomachenko. That's 9 years of fighting at the top level.

I also can't understand why he started so poorly against Lopez, but given how Lopez then beat Taylor maybe it's a case of Lopez being good enough to force Loma into such low levels of activity.

What I do know is, Lomachenko is, imo, the best LW in the world and I thinks he'll prove that against Kambosos meaning the Wahid fight will still have relevance if it ever gets made (with Wahid demanding a larger purse split I doubt it).

 

I've watched them more recently than you, as I watched them tonight.

You need to rewatch the rounds if you're gonna comment on this thread.

Watch them both now, in real time and score them.