Scoring Loma's Losses

I've watched them countless times, and I've previously timestamped all the single digit punches landed in that round, those that did and did not land (but thought too by many) - I've done this comprehensively

you can pretend I haven't though even though I'm certain you've seen those posts

 

You don’t know what you’re talking about dude

 

After reading through this thread, I went back to check Loma's record and it still says '17-3'. WTF???

 

I’ve watched them on numerous occasions at separate times because I’m aware one can score one round differently on a separate watch.

Ive timestamped the punches before clearly documenting that Loma landed cleaner shots and more frequently in rounds 2 and 6. If you want me to waste my time and do it again I will watch it later this week and get back to you

You’ve scored 5 rounds to an injured one armed much smaller Loma..one round is needed for a draw. When I clearly outline the timestamped punches in rounds 2 and 6, I hope I can expect reason discussion of the landed punches in these rounds (ultimately punches landed is the main criteria, there’s no ring generalship if you aren’t landing and getting tagged) . I can admit when I’m wrong, I hope you’ll can too when I go through the rounds

 

How you are scoring is fundamentally flawed. You’re seeing punches fly around but you have no idea if they’re landing , you just assume they are even if they’re not or you’re uncertain.

There is 0 bias in my method and way more bias in your method, since you choose to believe punches landed for one fighter when by simply having a closer look they are not.

You’re approach is opinion over fact, or what you think rather than what is actually there.

You can pretend you’re being the objective one but you’re not. I’m the only one here who has timestamped every single punch in that round and compared their cleanliness. You have done absolutely nothing to claim I’m the one being biased so you can get yourself off that high horse.

Boxing is about clean punches landed ultimately, if you can’t see the punches or don’t want to understand what punches actually land then I don’t think you should bother trying to claim your perspective is true.

“You score a round by watching the fight and seeing who you think won the round.”
So basically 0 attention to detail, or curiosity into who actually landed the better work.

how about this, since I’m the only one putting effort into objectively judging these rounds, I challenge you to timestamp all punches landed in round 6 (or round 2) for me. One round 3 minutes.

 

And wow. I just watched round 6 back real time didn’t even need to slow it down. How in the **** can anyone score that for Lopez? He literally did ZERO for 2 mins 45, then uppercutted Lomas chest ay the end of the round and barely touched Loma with the right hand. Loma significantly outlanddd Lopez in this round. I’m actually shocked how anyone can score this round to Lopez

Round 2 is for sure harder to see than Round 6 which is just absolutely a Loma round

 

okay you’re scoring without any accuracy, cool.

Round 6 you can clearly see real time Loma winning that round, 2 is for sure harder to see.

 

besides lopez gameplan, strength and size he had re aggravated a persistent shoulder injury

 

Funny thing is ppl want Haney FOTY even tho, out of Lomas 3 losses, that fight was a draw or Loma win.

Nonetheless Haney is good for boxing. He's the antithesis of Tank/PBC in that he takes meaningful fights