Scott Gilfoid: I see no difference between Wawrzyk and Hughie Fury

Why even bother to take a guy who thinks Povetkin is a blown up cruiserweight, Carl Froch is a protected hype job, who scored Chagaev-Valuev for SNV seriously?

 

He is a member here, his alts are MVC and ellerbe

 

I thought i wrote this article pretty well

 

:scaredas:

 

Yeah well he might have a point, exactly how good is hughie fury?
IMO he's utter S.HIT!

 

The only opponents he would take issue with are the ones that would beat Wilder.

 

There is hardly any other reason for making such an article than to intentionally disrespect or bash Hughie Fury.

Hughie is only 20 years old and he's been out of the ring due to injury until recently if I'm correct. He is doing well right now considering that he's just a prospect and to be clear there isn't anything similar between him and Wawrzyk.

Wawrzyk has only had 1 fight on note, where he served as Povetkin's tune-up opponent for Klitschko, and Wawrzyk got destoyed inside 3 rounds. Recently there was a thread where we were rating Povetkin's opponents, and the consensus opinion was that Wawrzyk was around the bottom.

Defending that guy as a title defense, while calling Hughie Fury "another Wawzyk" isn't worth commenting, especially coming from "writer" that most likely doesn't even exist.

I haven't viewed any BN24 article in years and articles like that are pretty much the main reason.

 

:good

 

His been bashing hughie since the beginning, even after his first pro fight he was making articles bashing him, after every fury fight he makes at least 1-2 threads bashing hughie

 

Does that mean Hughie is for real?

 

He must feel really threaten by him Id say haha