Scott Harrison v Injin Chi

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by D-MAC, Sep 27, 2008.


  1. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    In their respective primes.

    Who would have won this FW battle?

    Two granite-chinned, heavy-handed punching machines beating lumps out of eachother.

    Blood and guts action while it lasts.

    I think it is an interesting one.

    :think
     
  2. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    chi by ud possibly late ko,he had an iron chin,good punch,good workrate&decent boxing skills,i think he'd have to much for scott.
     
  3. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Chi`s not knocking out Harrison. This would have been a war but both guys would have made the final bell with Chi scraping a close decision. But remember Harrison always did well against brawlers and come forward sluggers.
     
  4. Axl_Nose

    Axl_Nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,648
    2
    May 9, 2007
    Chi knocks him out late, Harrison was always vastly over-rated like Alex Arthur, at least Chi tested himself against a true world level opponent in Erik Morales, ok he came up short but he was competitive for periods .. I watched Scot get beat by an old and weathered Medina and get a draw against Polo, a few months later Polo doesnt take a round against Marquez .... Harrison was a good domestic fighter but thats about it, Chi KO 10th
     
  5. Axl_Nose

    Axl_Nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,648
    2
    May 9, 2007
    Chi was a fair banger, Harrisons chin wasnt tested by that big a puncher, Medina, Polo and Mccullough didnt have the guns but that doesnt mean Chi didnt ..
     
  6. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I went for Chi by UD myself.

    I feel his extra mobility would aid him in a fight with the plodding Harrison.

    Its not a gimme though.
     
  7. girv

    girv Gatekeeper Full Member

    1,003
    2
    Mar 6, 2007
    Both granite chins, both tough as ****, both come forward warriors.

    Could go either way, I cant split them so I go for a draw.
     
  8. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    Agreed, spot on.
     
  9. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    You sell Harrison way to short. He had his fair share of gimmes and he was very limited in terms of he`s skillset but he was much better than you describe. He had the a fighters mentality in the ring and only floundered when he faced boxers. Chi is not a boxer. He was more a cum forward slugger much the same as Harrison. Must admit though Chi gave Morales a nasty shiner!
     
  10. John18

    John18 Active Member Full Member

    1,490
    0
    Feb 24, 2008
    I voted for Harrison on points, but I'd accept Chion points or a draw.

    Both are very tough guys, and contrary to whats been said above, Chi wouldn't be too tough for Harrison.
     
  11. columbo man

    columbo man Active Member Full Member

    1,000
    1
    Jan 18, 2008
  12. Axl_Nose

    Axl_Nose Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,648
    2
    May 9, 2007
    You make some interesting points, but i think Chi was a better slugger than Harrison was and im very sceptical about Harrison at this level because hes never been there, i think a prime Chi is better than anybody he ever faced, i dont particularly think Chi was a brilliant fighter but Scott Harrison was truly 'WBO' average
     
  13. girv

    girv Gatekeeper Full Member

    1,003
    2
    Mar 6, 2007
    I remember how upset he was after the fight. He was probably past his best by then.
     
  14. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Harrison points