Seeing that all of Crawford's biggest wins have lost is it fair to say that he has an awful resume?

Yes, by far, not one B+ And above level fighter

 

Nah cause they could also say he ruined them

 

Nah people use “”ruined” to willy nilly. I don’t think he did. I think SSR ruined Chocolito. He will never be the same

 

Not a great resume but now "awful" either. It's the main reason I can't put him above Loma in the PFP rankings.

 

Nobody beat Horn

 

You can only fight who's put in front of you. It's not Crawford's fault 135 and 140 were weak divisions when he fought in them. He deserves credit for being undisputed and cleaning out a division.

 

That remains to be seen, but the first fight took it's toll, as seen in the rematch. Gonzales looked mentally off.
He could rebound, as many greats have done so before.

 

It doesn't look good especially Prograis destroying Indongo as he did. But Crawford beat Postol far easier than Taylor.

 

2 weeks ago you started a thread entitled

Right now I think it's fair to say Crawford has a pretty good resume.

Now after postal get's beat by one of the most promising 140lb prospects we have seen for a while, suddenly his resume is awful?

lol

His resume isn't amazing, but its far from awful, postal looked great last night, so did taylor, two very good fighters.

 

@BoxingIQ,

Dude, you gotta' get over this obsession with the "zero.!"


You know why "the golden age of boxing" was golden? (besides rose-colored glasses)
Because most of those guys lost a few times. Losing a fight is how you learn & improve.

 

I think its fair to say that fighters do not recover from a crawford asses whippin. Bud Crawford aka career wrecker.

 

He has the same resume as Chenko, with more fights.

 

Crawford doesn't have a lost against a old Salido, just saying....