Seeing that all of Crawford's biggest wins have lost is it fair to say that he has an awful resume?

This.

I'd argue that Postol and Gamboa are Crawford's best wins.

To be fair to Postol he's been very inactive after losing to Crawford and Taylor is actually really good and has a lot of potential.

I was never impressed with Felix Diaz and knew he'd be no competition to Crawford, since he couldn't even beat Lamont Peterson. I think Gamboa was a better win.

Indongo is good against the right opponent, but is a limited southpaw with no chin. If you neutralize his left hand and have good timing he's very beatable. I think Gamboa's a better fighter than Indongo, but the Indongo fight was more significant for Crawford, since all of the belts were up for grabs.

 

Oh no not Crawfords resume threads again. YES it isnt that great but what? What is it we are meant to take from that? His resume is average so he must be average?

 

A bit awkward, lol