Seldon or Peter, who was the better fighter?

I havnt seen the fight since live with joe hipp but i remember thinking after that seldon was gana at least hang with tyson for a bit damn i was wrong , but I still think he was good enough to beat peter and with his limits ie chin , I think he did okay and was a decent heavy. Peter on the other hand was lucky he didnt get exposed earlier in his career , with his limitations he done well for himself but true talent wasn't there , very beatable by the same blueprint over and over again.

 

Except when he put on a masterclass against James Toney.

 

:roll:

...and Sam Peter wasn't "mostly just one of Don King's house bums"?

 

Take it easy!

He did outbox Toney in the rematch and did somewhat improve his technique in the interim, but a lot of it had to do with Toney being out of shape (more than usual), jaded & unmotivated from the prior robbery loss, and phoning it in.

It isn't like S.P. became Sweet Pea. :yep :nono