September 8th: which card will you choose?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Aug 18, 2012.


  1. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    You are missing the point.

    Fair enough if you had Chambers winning....but to give Adamek only 1 round is WAAYY OFF BASE.:patsch

    No one but BJ Flores agrees with you.

    P.S Chambers landed a whopping 18 more punches(most of which were back hand flicks)....18
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    So from the way Samurai has described it, we actually have TWO distinct conflicts:


    In the afternoon:

    The Wealth TV heavyweight tripleheader in the US (shown on Polish PPV)

    vs.

    Vitali Klitschko vs. Manuel Charr


    At night:

    HBO doubleheader

    vs.

    Showtime doubleheader


    ...with the ShoX stuff probably fitting in neatly between the afternoons cards and the nighttime cards and hopefully not overlapping with either.



    For me it's..

    Afternoon: Klitschko vs. Charr, no contest. **** that boring tripleheader. Adamek, Cunningham and Jennings will all win boring decisions. Jennings might get an accumulation TKO. That's about 30 or so rounds of guaranteed :dead

    Nighttime: HBO. (with Sho Extreme as an appetizer) Showtime later, recorded on DVR.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    It isn't a punch-counting contest. This isn't the amateurs.

    Chambers landed flush right jabs (as a southpaw) and lead rights (while orthodox) switching back and forth, moving and denying Adamek many clean touches at all. If Adamek's gloves touched Chambers it was hardly ever a flush shot...and most of the punches Adamek threw didn't even make slight glancing contact.

    It isn't like there were a lot of close rounds, or a lot of variety on the theme from one to the next. Most of the fight progressed the same way: Adamek throwing a lot more but missing, and Chambers throwing very little with the right hand but scoring it (as a jab or power lead, depending on the stance) pretty much whenever he did let it go.

    Even if 11 rounds feature Chambers doing just enough to scrape by on clean quality connects while making Adamek miss loads and loads...that's still 11 rounds to Chambers. Just because a fight "seems" close because of one guy throwing a lot more and the other landing at a much higher %, doesn't mean the score can't be wide in favor of the latter.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    HBO PPV? :huh
     
  5. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Surley not as boring as you doing a RBR on a Wednesday at 10:00am from a card with no names fighting out of Norway or Bulgaria.
     
  6. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Maybe i can do Adamek-Walker RBR seeing as i hate Vitali-Charr. Sure i will be checking in on it though or watch both at once. Also wanna see how much Cunningham has left and how he looks at HW.
     
  7. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Thank god the judges werent Adamek haters like you.:lol:

    Shameful scorecard on your part...you are in no place to ever complain about badge judging in a fight.
     
  8. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Your score?
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Adamek UD
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, but against Gavern? :!:

    Goral, USS, and By-By all have gimmes.

    Klitschko vs. Charr isn't exceptionally attractive, no, but it's by far the best heavyweight match-up of the afternoon given that Vitali is getting up there and 'father time is undefeated' (which, btw, the Diamond Boy is as well :D)
     
  11. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    ****, Lucas is fighting?

    It's gonna be a tricky night...
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    You scored a UD to Adamek? :nut How many people are you?

    PolishBumbler. :yep
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    Bouts of interest, in order:

    1) Ward vs. Dawson
    2) tie - Matthysse vs. Olusegun & DeMarco vs. Molina
    3) Alexander vs. Bailey
    4) Klitschko vs. Charr
    5) eh, whatever else...probably Sugar Shay and Kid Chocolate, followed by whoever is on the Moscow undercard, followed by the Wealth TV ****.
     
  14. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    I mean scorecard like 116-112 for _____
     
  15. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Swap Klitschko-Charr with Wealth TV and we are the same. Do wanna see Kid Chocolate Quillin though also