Sergey Kovalev is a much less skilled fighter then Gennady Golovkin

I thought you were done . I guess I owned you so badly, that you didn't want to head out in shame. Are you going to cry more about something Hopkins said about nearly a decade ago?

 

Also dense.

 

Yes you are incredibly dense. How someone can just expose themselves as a huge hypocrite is just comical. I hope you're just a troll .

 

Keep moving the goalposts, chief. Your original post only stated that Kovalev was more skilled because his resume was better.

The mental gymnastics you're going through to rationalize it to the point where you were right all along are irrelevant. Your original point was "better resume=better skill", and it took about 3 seconds to think of an example to disprove it.

 

:good:good:good

 

Interesting way to look at it, but I can't agree with:
Chilemba = Adama (I think Chilemba is quite a bit better),
Boone < Simon (think Boone is better),
Cleverly = Proksa (think Cleverly is better)

Also the best couple of names are more important than #12 vs #12, #13 vs #13, etc.

 

Kovalev is a bit less skilled than Golovkin but would win h2h.

IMHO, of course.

 

Froch publically admitted he didn't want to fight Golovkin