Sergey Kovalev is a much less skilled fighter then Gennady Golovkin

If he doesn't KO Brook, you might be changing your tune about that.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

Eh i dont agree with Campillo > Monroe, Agnew > ishida, Boone > Macklin. Also Caparello is probably around the same levle as Rosado, Rosado gets so overrated on this board it's not even funny.

 

IMO Kovalev has face names that are more familiar to US fans. But rating who is A-level and who is not, is totally subjective. Most fanatic believe guy who has fought HBO or Showtime and is from states is an A-level fighter.

I don´t rate Pascal anything special. He has so much flaws in his game and he has struggled several times against average fighters. Hopkins has a great record, but when Kova fought him, he was 50 years old. If I rate them an A-level, then I have to give nod to Lemieux and Murray as well. Based on pure name value, Kova has better resume hands down.

Cleverly is more or less the same level as Geale and Macklin. A guy who had paper title and had easy comp until he stepped up and lost badly. Geale is a bit similar and even though Macklin was only just close to get the belt, he was beating similar level comp as Cleverly.

Pascal is like Lemieux, very good in some things and very tough, but both have obvious flaws.

Stevens, Murray, Proksa and Rosado are comparable to Mohammedi, Caparello and Campillo. Maybe even Ishida. I don´t see much of a difference on levels. The only difference is that Proksa wasn´t well known in states when he met Golovkin.

Rubio, Ishida and Monroe Jr. are more or less comparable to Boone, Agnew, Sillakh and White.

These comparisons are very subjective and nobody really knows exactly who is who, but if they are close enough, I would be careful not to make any strict conclusions.

Btw. I´m a fan of both

 

murray and lemieux a level? LMFAOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jesus christ the fanboys on this site have absolutely no shame.

 

And you don´t have even slightist understanding of relativitity, logical thinking, understanding of ****ogy or how to behave. As a matter of fact, It seems you don´t even know how to read. :rofl

 

Little g has never fought above c level. that's a fact. Bhop and Pascal were B level when they fought Kovalev. Murray and Lemieux were not on their level.

 

I don't know how useful these A,B or C level discussions are. It's so arbitrary as there isn't any criteria for any of them. Same as P4P really; we think these letters hold more credence to arguments but they're largely meaningless and difficult to debate.

 

Stevenson blows Krusher resume away.

Dawson>>>> Hopkins

Bellew, , Fonfara, Cloud >>>>>>> Chilemba , Pascal , Mohammedi

 

Their resumes are extremely similar in terms of quality. I do think Pascal is a better win than anything Stevenson has done yet, but then again I'm one of the biggest Pascal fanboys.