Fair call but still solid enough and convincing in Qawi's performance in them. I'd favour him over Kovalev @175 for what it's worth.
I think that’s fine. I was arguing with Xplosive who doesn’t want to admit that Canelo is better than Qawi pfp.
Yeah, I'm not gonna admit that a juiced up cherry picker who always has all the odds stacked in his favor is better than a legitimately great fighter. Sorry, not gonna happen. I'm not on DAZN's payroll and I didnt start following the sport yesterday - I don't think of Canelo as a great fighter. I think he's a very good fighter who's been made to APPEAR great through selective matchmaking and dubious, at best, decisions.
Kovalev has let his stock fall through the floor since his prime. He'd have been right up there, if he'd continued how he'd started.
Listen carefully silly bollocks.You stated he lost "more than 30 % of his fights".He didnt! You stated," the upper weights are in their prime from 30 to about 40" I proved most of them retire in their early 30's,and giving Archie Moore as an example is nonsense because he was past his prime by his own admission when he fought Marciano.NO fighter is in his prime at 40 years old! That's the bottom line,you are wrong on both counts, par for the course. End Of! Go bore someone else you little weasel !
This is your quote. Maxim lost more than a third of his fights. Ra's Al-Ghul, Wednesday at 10:08 PM Report This is actually more than 30%,its over 33 and a 3rd%! Life isn't treating you too well at the moment is it sweetie!
