Sergio Martinez: 'I challenge Pacquiao for his 154lbs title' - who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Nov 21, 2010.


  1. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,460
    18
    Feb 13, 2010
    You r a blind Pac fan.
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Not at all. I spent a long time arguing why Martinez would beat Pavlik, even though many disagreed, because I understood the styles in hand. Even though I'm a big Martinez fan, I see him losing this bout. It's not about me being biased, that's just how I see the fight going down.

    If you disagree, fine, let's hear your argument. To simply say I'm biased, is wrong.
     
  3. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    You're biased because you're incapable of understanding that Sergio Martinez has a greater boxing intellect than Manny Pacquiao. Aside from being much smarter, he's bigger, as fast if not faster.
    Pacquiao can't beat a marginally bigger man in Floyd Mayweather let alone a much bigger man of the same caliber in Martinez. This is why you are biased Jack.
     
  4. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Most likely outcome is Martinez on the cards or by late stoppage.

    However, I'd be interested to see how Martinez handles Pac's power both to the body and to the head when he drops his hands.
     
  5. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Maravilla would taunt and toy with the ladyboy **** and stop him.
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Since when is Martinez close to the same calibre as Mayweather? He clearly isn't. And as fast as Pacquiao? You're having a laugh.

    I read a post from you earlier, about John, Dirrell, Mayweather and Martinez. I thought you were joking, bu apparently you're a ****ing idiot.

    And if you disagree, say why.
     
  7. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Pac doesn't belong at 154...
     
  8. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
    Martinez Round6 TKO
     
  9. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    My original post is for the most part a universally understood known. Most people that know this sport and know it well know that it comes down to skill. Any of the 4 fighters I listed earlier have no competition.
     
  10. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Well now you are just being ******ed.
     
  11. Pokerpapi999

    Pokerpapi999 Inmigration reform NOW!!! Full Member

    802
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    pac is too small for martinez
     
  12. kingalex

    kingalex Guest

    +1
     
  13. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    It should be mentioned that Martinez was only 3lbs heavier than Margarito and Martinez really isn't a physical fighter, so those extra 3lbs wouldn't be an issue. If Margarito couldn't outmuscle Pacquiao and enforce his size advantage, there's very little chance Martinez would.

    Size is a non-issue in this fight, which is why Pacquiao would win. He's a better boxer, smarter, has a better corner and wouldn't be up against a guy who can enforce the size difference.
     
  14. kingalex

    kingalex Guest

    I disagree with that.
     
  15. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Do you think Martinez has a better chance of making use of his weight, than Margarito had? Margarito, for all his faults, is one of the best pressure fighters in the last decade and if anyone out there was going to use pressure and size to get to Pacquiao, it was him.

    I just don't see how the size becomes a factor, unless you're talking about it simply being a case of his punches carrying too much weight behind them.