Serious question bout Cotto vs Foreman...

if he was injured, he should of never fought

 

Its Foreman's fault for going into the ring with a ****ed up kneee, thats how I see it. When going into the right every fighter MUST be at 100%.

 

You are right about that. They also then try to say "aw, well he was fighting a 1 legged fighter the WHOLE fight."; he was dominated the WHOLE fight then ONLY hurt it in the 7th round. :yep

 

I actually remember quite a few people saying Foreman was going to box Cotto's ears off.

 

I agree, I understand some people want to show that they are warriors and all that nonsense, but when it comes down to it, there's a line that separates being a warrior and being smart. And if Foreman wanted to be smart he should of took some time off to recover that knee

 

He aggravated an injury.
You guys can't be serious. Like Yuri would know in advance that his leg would slip out like that on the mat.

 

Regardless of how you want to view it the fact remains:
He aggravated an injury to a pretty intense degree and he continued to fight.
Of course that's a tough thing to do and most (you included as well as I) more than likely could not pull that off.

 

I could only imagine what some of you would say had he backed out of the fight when a knee brace, in most respects, would have allowed him to fight effectively.

Now you're saying "ah, he did the dumb thing"
I think we all know what you'd be saying if he did indeed opt out of the fight.

 

being from South Africa, what is your opinion of Flo Simba?

 

before the fight people were saying cotto was done and that foreman was actually too big with good boxing skills and his movement would give him a comfortable decision against cotto.

cotto wins then foreman is the biggest jewish crippled bum in sports history