pineda? :huh you mean the guy arnel pineda who sings on the band journey. he is not worth talking about imo. and im filipino. why the **** should we consider a guy who sings for an established band but never wrote any of the songs he is singing a God?
How is it bull****? So Beating weight drain, way past their primes fighters prove he's the number p4p fighter and one of the best? Give me a break man.
same with you. give me a ****in break. whos your fave fighter? your **** is getting old. any objective and knowledgeable boxing fan would laugh at your argument.
David Diaz is just a tune up fight for him in 135. You can't blame him. He has been banging bodies w/ anyone as far as I can remember. A fighter is entitled to one easy fight once in a while. Could you explain why Marquez fought Jaca, Jandaeng, Polo, and Salido when he could have fought Morales, Soto, Guzman, etc.?
Mayweather use to been one of my favorites but he's really disappointed me as of late and fighting a smaller fighter in Marquez really takes the cake. I'm a fan of Paul Williams, Andrade, Taylor ( Jermain), Guzman, Marquez, Cotto, Clottey, Diaz (Juan).
Nacho said Oscar was not weight drained, even Futch confirmed that. He wanted to be light in fighting Pac but Pac w/ his skills and power dominated him.
Of Course Nacho will say that cause he don't want to take the blame on him. Any body with a freaking brain knows Oscar was clearly weight drain. The Man weigh in at 147 pounds on fight night for crying out loud and look like a zombie before the 1st bell ring. Even FREDDIE ROACH ADMIT THAT OSCAR WAS WEIGHT DRAIN IN WHICH HE KNEW THAT'S THE ONLY WAY PACQUIAO WILL HAVE HUGE ADVANTAGE.
what about if some guy told you paul williams beat an over the hill version of winky and overrated margarito? ...or say marquez beat salido polo and jaca and lost to john? ..or say jermain taylor is **** he lost to carl ****in froch? ..or say juan diaz is an overrated fighter who lost to an old guy named campbell? ..or say cotto should have lost to old ass mosley and he lost to slow ass margarito? ...each ****in fighter you mentioned has his own hits and misses...and there you go bashing pac to the point that he has not done nothing worthwhile in his boxing career.. your post on pac is very much like the argument i wrote above. its an argument of a 10 year old who pretends he is a boxing fan I DONT GET IT.
I cant see it. I will repeat. Who Pac fight then instead of Morales and Barrera? I hope it is clear now. Originally Posted by rayhogan This content is protected The first sentence is the one that is not true. Who are really true the quality/elite opposition for the last 5 years he beat? Old Morales who was coming off losses? Old Barrera in the rematch when he was coming off a loss? A shot weight drain De la hoya? Already ruined chin but never was really very good in Hatton? David Diaz? The only i can think of is Marquez in which many thought Marquez won the rematch. Yes Pacquiao is a very humble guy and all that is an exciting fighter to watch no doubt but many biased Pacquiao fans thinks he's unstoppable cause of his overrated wins over Morales twice, Barrera rematch, Marquez rematch, De la hoya, Hatton. <<<<If you look at reality of those fighters except Marquez, were they really at their best? and was one of them really that good?
Atleast those fighters fought better competition then all of Pacquiao resumes of the last 5 years. Williams beat 2 top ten fighters that was at their peak in Margarito, Quintana. Taylor has fought Hopkins twice, Wright, Ouma, Spinks, Pavlik twice. <<All ain't really tune ups and in which is better then all Pacquiao resumes for the last 5 years. Campbell maybe over 35 but he sure don't fight like it huh? And Campbell is easily a much better fighter then DAVID DIAZ WHO BARELY SURVIVE VS A SHOT MORALES FOR GOD SAKE. Juan Diaz has beaten better fighters then David Diaz. <<Can you denied that? Cotto also has beaten better fighters and is facing another tough fighter. In which your boy Pacquiao only face old shot fighters but oh well.