Seriously, how can you not like pac?

I won't lose time whit this if I am a fan girl or not isn't a very exciting discussion for me. I think that you are a Pac fan because is normal for a lot of them to disrespect people only because they don't share their opinion.

 

post of a hater. dont pretend you like pac but dont like his fans cause that would make you more of a joke of a poster.

 

Pac made them look like nobodies!!!! Thats how he beat his opponents, he demolished them!!! deal with it....deal:deal

 

That stupid guy is looking for a perfect fighter w/ perfect opponents. Sadly those he mentioned can hardly be considered perfect fighters who fought perfect opponents.

 

Ok Pacquiao should have fought Raheem when Raheem was the one that really ruined Morales. Pacquiao should have fought Marquez in the rematch or top fighters like Soto or Guzman instead of a Barrera rematch. Lets make this clear, Pacquiao didn't really have no choice but to fight Marquez in the rematch cause every media, boxing writers, websites, tv network all wanted Pacquiao to fight Marquez in the rematch instead of David Diaz.

 

Raheem ruined Morales???You know what ruined means??? Morales didnt take anybeating from raheem...raheem runs all night long, pot shotting morales...you call that ruined??? hahahahaha...

 

ahahahahahaha!!! **** man youre really ****in clueless.

okay. pac beat a near prime version of barrera, won against marquez in a rematch that several people thought could have gone either way, and many people thought that dela hoya would smash him to pieces, and koed hatton whose only loss was against another atg, floyd mayweather

and to backtrack, he had fough enough decent comp in his younger days. sasakul was prime when he was beat, so was ledwaba (if your clueless about these fighters, do a research)

your argument about pac is pathetic at best..


btw im also a fan of those fighters you mentioned, you're just a pac hater

 

Near prime version? If you talk about that Barrera in the rematch then you don't know what prime really means. Many thought Marquez won the rematch from boxing writers, boxing websites from mostly alot of fans that ain't biased Pacquiao fans such as yourself. Of Course everybody thought Oscar would smash Pacquiao cause THEY ONLY LOOK AT SIZE DIFFERENTS BUT FORGOT ABOUT WHAT IT COULD EFFECT OF OSCAR WEIGHT DRAIN. I WAS MOSTLY THE ONLY ONE THAT SAY OSCAR LOOK LIKE HE WILL BE A WEIGHT DRAIN FIGHTER BEFORE THE FIGHT CAUSE HE LOOK DRAIN AND LOOK SO SKINNY AND THERE WAS REPORT OSCAR WAS BEATING UP BY SMALLER FIGHTERS IN SPARRING. Again Hatton was never really good. I always say Hatton is an overrated fighter that many people are clueless cause of his overrated wrestling win over Kostya.

 

WTF are you talking about? Raheem? This guy lost to average fighter like Juarez in 126. :rofl:rofl:rofl Btw, Pac has a rematch clause w/ Morales. He was mandated to fight him.:deal

 

Raheem easily embarrass Morales. Raheem imo should have fought Pacquiao instead of Morales but Pacquiao and his people got no confident and choose Morales cause of 2 things, one Morales prove he was way past his prime when he lost to Raheem and 2 cause of the money.

 

It validates the fact that some posters like are genius at hindsight. Is it Pac's fault that Oscar came up weight drained or Hatton was exposed as you said "not good at all." Most boxing writers predicted that Oscar would murder Pac and some even believed that Hatton is unbeatable in a weight division where he was king for almost a decade.

 

lo. ****ing raheem! of all! just by beating morales? come on...you can do better than that, think again. morales was still p4p even after a lost to raheem. you think raheem will generate more money than morales?

and did he not fight marquez in the rematch as you say so? of course, barrera has to be fought on the 2nd time it just happened that he lost to marquez prior but still, barrera was an attraction at the time.

Sotto and Guzman? You must be reading a lot that they are Pac's nightmares, lol.

and seriously, if you are on pac's shoes at the time, will you go on that route?

 

Wrong Wrong Wrong, Pacquiao did not have a rematch clause vs Morales. The rematch clause was from Morales that if Pacquiao beats Morales in the rematch that Pacquiao must fight Morales again for a rubbermatch. Unless you have source to back it up. Did you watch Raheem vs Juarez? Or you just look at boxrec.com?

 

im not biased im telling it as is. im not as ignorant as you when it comes to analyzing pacs resume. your post is tainted by hate and discrimination so stop babbling.

im more of a boxing fan, not just a pac fan. i love boxing more than any other sport. im defending pac not just because i am nuthugging him, but because of stupid arguments like these