Seth Mitchell Vs David Haye - Your opinions?

In my opinion, no one in the Heavyweight division can K.O Haye! Haye lost against Wladimir K, but he took shots and didn't go down, he even caught Wlad later in the fight (not sure which round) with a nice shot, but Wladimir held on to Haye. I believe Haye would beat Vitali, he would school Arreola with his power, speed, and agility. In my opinion, Seth Mitchell would be taken to school against Haye too. Seth Mitchell didn't look good against Witherspoon, very slow, flat footed, no agility or speed, just raw power and that's it! Haye is just too good for the top 9 heavyweights (at least)! Wladimir promised to Knock Haye out, he couldn't do it, because Haye's reflexes were too good for the K bro.

Anyway, what are your opinions?

 

It's true! Not a single heavyweight can Knock Haye out. In fact, Haye would have never been knocked out in his career, if he wasn't tired in that fight against Thompson in the cruisers.

 

Wlad K was throwing 3-4 shots at a time and each one was being dodged by Haye. The guy couldn't bully and pick when to knock Haye out, because Haye is a fighter who comes into his fights at a professional weight of around 15 stone, whereas the other fighters the K bros face are flat footed and cumbersome, and generally easy targets for the K bros.

 

And don't forget that Haye broke his toe, which means he was at a disadvantage to start with.

 

He threw a great shot at Wlad K in the middle/later rounds and Klitschko held on to Haye like a young child holds on to their mother. And he damaged his toe, which contributed to the lack of offence he could muster.