Seth Mitchell vs Deontay Wilder

Mitchell's chin is useless, Wilder's aint great either but he would land first. Wilder KO1.

 

Nichols kos them both in one round. The real title fight should be Sconiers vs Nichols. Would be FOTY

 

I think Seth Mitchell would definitely lose this one.

 

This may be true, but Mitchell would be a very live underdog. If he happened to catch Wilder on that shaky mandible before Wilder got him, it would be all over.

If Dustin Nichols and Harold Sconiers could put Wilder on the canvas, Mitchell could keep him there.:yep

 

Would be interesting, especially when Mitchell had his 0.... Guys like Price, and Mitchell were certainly more dangerous before they were exposed, Wilder is no different. Once everyone knows you're packing china, and you taste the canvas in a bad way your confidence often isn't what it once was.

 

50-50 more like 95-5

Wilder most likely KOs him in the first

 

That's a bit of a stretch..... Mitchell would've been a live underdog when he had his zero, and his confidence. As someone else stated, prior to being exposed by Banks and Arreola he had some impressive performances against guys better than almost anyone on Wilders resume except for Stiverne, and Scott. I'd favor Wilder, but 95-5 is ridiculous.

 

It's the same people making the 95-5 statements, who were also saying that Mitchell was a Klitschko beater prior to him losing.

And you can bet it's those same people who will write off Wilder once he gets exposed, as they are doing to Mitchell now. Bandwagon mentality.

 

:deal