Seth Mitchell vs Johnathon Banks - Fix fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxerlove, Oct 31, 2013.


  1. boxerlove

    boxerlove Guest

    The second fight was definitely a fixed fight. Banks could've finished him off but didn't.
     
  2. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    Banks was supposed to lose the first fight to set Mitchell up for Wlad. Banks screwed up and landed on Mitchell and shattered that glass. He made sure to lose the second fight to help get Wlad's plan back on track, though Arreola permanently derailed any possibility of Mitchell getting a shot.

    So yeah, it was fixed.
     
  3. boxerlove

    boxerlove Guest

    Exactly. Wlad said in an interview, jokingly and sarcastically ''Why did Johnathon beat Seth? Now I have no good Americans to fight!'', but you can tell it was a fix.
     
  4. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    i think it was an odd fight. it was even banks birthday and he fought like he wanted to lose. a couple times he would buzz Mitchell almost by accident then would let up the gas almost as if "oh **** i gotta chill" and kept his foot of the gas for that whole round.

    GBP probably cut him a nice fat under the table "bonus" for that fight.
     
  5. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    I saw that interview also, yeah he was trying to sound like he was joking....but he wasn't.
     
  6. silly_illy

    silly_illy Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,728
    2
    Feb 5, 2008
    ....inside source Banks swiss Banks are being investigated
     
  7. boxerlove

    boxerlove Guest

    Exactly, Banks was in a whole other class, EVERY shot Banks hit Mitchell with, Mitchell got hurt.
     
  8. boxerlove

    boxerlove Guest

    I agree.

    Banks could have won easily the second time.
     
  9. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,441
    26,735
    Jun 26, 2009
    LOL at the conspiracy theories.

    If they paid Banks to take a dive, why would they then put him in a fight against someone who could and did knock him out without doing the same again? What was the end game to paying off Banks.

    Banks has sparring partner syndrome. It's a mindset some fighters get into. He couldn't pull the trigger because he's been the guy paid to not pull the trigger in sparring for so long.
     
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,924
    Jan 18, 2010
    The whole thing reminded me of the Flintoff fight, in wich Dawson stopped punching when he knew he would hurt Freddy with anything he trew at him.
     
  11. boxerlove

    boxerlove Guest

    Conspiracy theories? It's OBVIOUS. Mitchell is leagues below Banks.

    Obviously Banks winning the first time was a mistake, Wlad wanted Banks to lose so he'd get Mitchell.
     
  12. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    keep up the good work with sh.itty threads :good

    well done boxerspam :good
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,785
    46,471
    Feb 11, 2005
    Banks said he injured both hands early in an interview I heard. Not sure if they were broken or no.
     
  14. A|C|S

    A|C|S The original |A|C|S| Full Member

    6,223
    5
    Oct 17, 2013
    Banks coulda finished that any round he wanted

    Someone actually picked Mitchell to beat Arreola based on the Banks II fight, it was definitely fixed
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    If it were fixed, my guess is that the payoff would have included Banks trying to make it mildly entertaining or let himself get knocked out. That alone makes me question why people would buy into the fix argument. This fight is not much more likely than any other fight to be fixed, just sayin.