Shane is going to get screwed twice out of the legit welterweight championship

"..Dude.." :rofl GTFOH with that ****..

 

Really, 'Doug Fischer and co' sounds like a reference to more than one person to me? Are you actually trying to claim that that wasn't a reference to the Ring advisory panel?

But no matter. Anyone who reads ESB regularly knows that the more smilies, personal abuse and WORDS IN CAPITALS in a san rafael post, the more he's losing an argument.

Are you actually going to answer my question?

 

You're a crybaby, Cobbler. A ****ing baby.

 

Ahahaha! I take it that's a 'no' then :hi:

 

What's this, simpleton? The tried and true method of false flagging, "san rafael?" :rofl

Type that a few more times. Maybe a few nationalist pussies will show up to help you. :rofl

 

You got owned 'dude'. Answer the question.

 

After he knocks out Berto, he'll probably have to fight Clottey, and maybe another WW. I don't think Floyd or Pacquiao will fight him. He will have two belts after he beats Berto up. He'll probably have to go up in weight again, unfortunately. The Ring should have made Shane v Margo_cheato for their title.

 

You reek of inferiority.

 

It was about Cotto. :rofl

 

He shouldn't have to wait on anyone.

 

The question you really need to answer is this: If the ring magazine title is supposed to define 'the man' at a weight, how can a fight for a vacant title possibly feature someone who lost their last fight at the weight to another fighter who is still fighting at that weight? :deal

 

Because he was still rated #3, and it was a close, somewhat disputed decision loss aided considerably by lots of loud oohing and aahing on the back of single jabs being landed? Great generics, "dude." Mosley is ****, you're all over it.

 

Usually when you have three fighters each with a win and a loss to the other two, that is an indication of fights being decided on a stylistic basis, rather than one fighter being 'the man'.

 

Mosley and Cotto were neck and neck. We all knew it. All there is to it.

 

I agree. So you don't proclaim someone as linear champion when they are neck and neck with someone else in that division, have fought them once and lost. That's pretty much a given in my opinion. Otherwise the notion of a linear champion starts to become rather meaningless.