Shane Mosley vs Errol Spence

Yeah. A one eyed Brook managed 5 rounds before the stoppage so...... Shane stops Spence

 

Spence, it's a stylistic issue. Spence is taller, longer and rangier, and he's rougher on the inside. Shane Mosley probably more than any other boxer I've ever seen hates being rough housed, you can look at it on his face when it happens.

 

It's a 50-50.

 

Would have to go with ESjr. Shane never regained any form of his former confidence post Viper. He was more gun shy then Uvalde SWAT...

 

Is losing to a prime Cotto a bad thing? Cotto was top notch operator in his prime.

 

Brooks eyes were good going into the fight. The previously damaged eye had zero to do with the other getting damaged.

 

Kell Brook so basic but he beat Porter more convincingly than Crawford, Spence, and Thurman.

I don't doubt Shane KOing Spence given his poor reaction to getting tagged

 

I would favour Spence here. Shane is far more proven but his best was below this weight and Spence is just the bigger man.
It would be a war with Shane getting stopped very late on or losing on points.

 

Brook was drained to oblivion. Took a beating from GGG at 160 and then boiled down to 147.

 

Ugas and Porter bothered Spence with their shots. Shane could very well stop Spence.

 

Yeah that was before GGG fcuked him up though. Still Shane KO.

 

I was going to say this. He looked awful at the weight

 

Now that may be true. But the narrative that Brook was fighting with only one good eye is not ture.

 

How do you think a mythical match up between Forrest and Spence plays out?

 

He wad roided out throughout his Career not just for that particular match sadly,

Hard to pick between the two, just depends on the time/circumstances and what kind of Camp both fighters have headed into the match,

Edge to Mosley & with him losing to prime Cotto at least he didn't avoid fighting him given that time.