Shane Mosley's resume

steroids-> without roids lost all of his big fights except margarito without bricks and shot vargas.
I know mosley is better then this but still he always was a little bit overrated.

 

So should Mayweather's, since he stopped after the second in that one.

 

This content is protected

an Oscar leftover

This content is protected

a contraversial victory and a cheating victory

This content is protected

2 losses

This content is protected

2 losses

This content is protected

An Oscar and Tito left over and past prime

This content is protected

what was his biggest win?

This content is protected

A loss

This content is protected

Wow another Oscar and Tito past prime leftover

This content is protected

His only real big clear win

This content is protected

Another loss to a former Oscar opponent that Oscar fought to a SD

This content is protected

another loss
Terrible resume

 

I want you to break down SRL's career next :hat

 

I think his DeLaHoya bouts were some of best battles.....I am(was) a Shane Mosley fan, the pre-2008 one........Now he is fishing for paydays..which in itself is okay, just don't insult my intelligence with promising battles in exchange for friendly sparring matches.

 

Why :huh

 

He was in his prime still and its a very good resume, Your analysis is very boiased for example when oscar fought floyd he wasnt as past his prime like shane and it was at 154 not 147

 

lost to duran
won duran 2 knewing duran would get fat after fights and made the fight quickly.
Defeated green hearns
Waited for hagler to get past prime, ran like a ***** and get a undeserved decision.
Lost to hearns but got a gift draw.
Had a pointless rubbermatch with a shot duran
Lost to norris and got ktfo by featherfisted camacho.

You can really do this to any boxer but in mosleys case things are a bit more true then in rays career

 

he wasnt on roids on his first victory over oscar , it is easy to look over a resume and be critical. consistently not ducking opponents until there shot and weight drained or asking them for pathetic catchweights should be given credit for. His resume is credible and a hall of famers at that

 

his resume is great BUT he lost to most of those dudes there & the BALCO thing

 

He's definitely Hall of Fame worthy, but as far as the all-time greats go... he maybe ranks somewhere around 100. He may not even be within the 100 actually. Great resume when compared to the average fighter, not so great when compared with The Greats of All Time.

 

100% correct

 

Pretty damn good resume, but I think people dont give him enough credit for the quality of competition he fought. How many fighters would have rematched the monsters that beat him RIGHT AWAY. Shane was a true warrior, Hall of Famer and is his resume for me does crack the top 100 ATG.... just by an inch. H2H however, in terms of all time great... I have him EXTREMELY high... particularly at lightweight. I think they where maybe only 2 or 3 lightweights in history that could beat Shane on his best day.