But they had it close until like the 8th round I believe it was. Might've been sooner than that but they did indeed have it close.
pretty conclusive. Hatton loses then. This the man that has lost once SSM has lost how many. Cotto Quit 2 rounds before he was beat. Hatton went out on his shield. I think we find ourselves in a world of mis matches trying to prove points that are not worth it. SSM v Hatton will be brilliant and I forsee it happening once Ricky destroys the pacman.
I think you are getting ahead of yourself here. I back Hatton to beat Pac, based upon a number of factors. Namely the fact that Pac hasn't beaten a quality live body above 130. But against Mosley he will be little more than a live dog. SSM has proven power at 147, not to mention speed and possesses the punches to make Hatton his *****. The fact that Hatton has one loss and Shane five is of little (if any) relevance. Look at their competition levels, and tell me SSM would have more than one loss had he fought the same level of comp - perhaps Tszyu excepted. Hatton would have seven, perhaps eight losses fighting Shane's.
That means nothing, Maywhether is bigger than Hatton but he campaigned mostly at 130-135. Peoples bodies are just differant and change more with age.
It may be worth noting that British kids tend to find their size, and therefore their natural weight around the age of 16. Hatton fought at light welter as an amateur, before turning pro at 18.
A stupid fight, Hatton loses his luster at 147 big-time. All advantage would be with mosely, who has fought at higher weights most of the past ten years.
First,Shane will catch Hatton with his left hook then Hatton will bounce off TWO ring posts and SSm will finish it off with the overhand right.