Shaun Porter is a C Level poor fighter, Brook doesn't even have ONE good win!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by suley0121, Sep 1, 2015.


  1. Pathetic Fist

    Pathetic Fist Eddie Hearn's Best Friend Full Member

    18
    0
    Sep 3, 2015
    Porter is top ten P4P Brooke made him look 'C Class'

    And that was MY Union Jack in the ring after the decision was announced, I now have it back in my possession autographed by Kell.

    I am a HARDCORE fan nothing CASUAL about me.
     
  2. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    that would be a horrible series of fights for a champion

    1. jo jo dan
    2. frankie gavin
    3. diego chevez
    4. bizier

    hahhaha.....in a division where you have bradley, thurman, khan, maidana, pacman , guerrero, berto, rios, mayweather, etc you fight the worst names. guerrero and rios are not even world class but at least they are well known but the list above is beyond horrible.

    eddie hearn protects his fighters too much....he knew after froch that kell brook is the only one left for him to make money....that's why fw is much better at least he puts his fighters in fights in which there is a possibility of them losing.....hearn is just protecting brook and waiting for the khan fight to happen

    i hope khan dont give him the fight...
     
  3. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,092
    Feb 16, 2013
    Yes I agree with you, Brook isn't pulling up trees either, I'm starting to lose patience to be honest, the only thing Brook has in his favour is Khan did everything in his power to avoid Brook.

    That was unforgivable in my opinion. Turning down Brook, world title (if he won would have been one of two champions with Mayweather), biggest payday of his career for Chris Algieri after saying he wants huge fights with huge names.

    Khan has turned himself in to an embarrassment, he opens his mouth and does the damage himself. Sometimes Khans stupidity amazes me.
     
  4. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,092
    Feb 16, 2013

    See I have no problem with what you say, it's your opinion and that's fine but Id be interested in your opinions on these facts...

    Khan has not fought a genuine top 10 fighter in any weight for well over 3 years.

    Khan has turned down Brook on a number of occasions. Even though it would be his biggest payday by a long way.

    I'm starting to lose patience with Brook and Hearn but if Khan does not serve up a top 7 welterweight in his next fight will you be losing patience after all this time?

    After all Khan claims to be elite and he is looking at Provodnikov who is a light welterweight.

    Brook has been there all this time, Khan just does not want it, if we can agree on that then I think we can turn our attentions to giving them BOTH hammer for poor opponents.
     
  5. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    yea i agree.... khan has not fought top opposition at 147 either, but i expect him to do so in the next couple of fights.... he has done it
    at 140 so it wont be a surprise

    if brook fought a thruman next and beat him, i guarantee you khan would take the fight with brook and even his fans would be telling khan to take it.....but fact remains that brook is yet to step up after porter

    as for provodnikov fight... this is not top opposition but some people will give khan for a fight like this simply because ruslan can punch and there is a high possibility he can KO khan....he arguably beat bradley as well at 147..... so while not a top 147 fight the fight will still prove something ....better than collazo, algeiri, etc.

    all eyes on khan next opponent...
     
  6. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,158
    May 30, 2008

    Can't say I agree, I don't think Khan will fight at of the top guys at 147 in his next couple of fights. He'll continue to fight handpicked featherfisted opposition just has he has done throughout his career.

    And if Brook fought Thurman and beat him I think that would give Khan even more reason to continue avoiding him.
     
  7. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    diagree.....the only reason khan did that was becuz he was waiting himself out for the mayweather showdown.....now floyd is retiring so he doesn't need to play it safe..... similar to how bradley ducked khan and fought casamayor so he could fight pacman

    brook fight will always be there
     
  8. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,092
    Feb 16, 2013
    Fair play, like I say I'm not impressed with Chaves and I really wasn't impressed with Gavin.

    I can't really dig Brook out for Dan because it was a mandatory, Khan fought Salita and that was a joke but wasn't he a mandatory? So it wasn't Khans choice. I've seen Roy Jones Jr, Hopkins and the like get absolutely hammered for really poor mandatory opponents. It happens.

    I can and will give Brook grief for Gavin because that was a choice and it was very very poor choice. A blatant pi**take in my opinion.

    As for Khan, we will see, he might surprise us all and give us a top name, personally I do not see it, Pacquiao has been mentioned (shades of Mayweather) and although it was only a mention I expect Rios or Guerrero at very best and another run of poor opponents until he gets the Pacquiao fight or it's dead.

    I like many others get frustrated, we probably all want the same fights, we know it takes time but Brook Vs Khan Should be one of the easiest fight to make. we all would love to see Brook Vs Khan for different reasons.

    Provodnikov shouldn't be even mentioned for Khan, Khan has been telling us for over two years he is better than Mayweather so he has to start backing it up now, over 3 years without a top 10 opponent and claiming to be elite is a joke whatever way you try and justify it.

    They can both kill these accusations of poor opponents and no big fights if they just do it, sign and fight and we can all put this to bed once and for all.... Unless Howard Foster is the referee and we will be probably arguing for months over another p*** poor stoppage :lol:
     
  9. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    When Bradley turned down Khan he didn't fight anybody, he'd fallen out with his then promotor and waited months for their contract to expire. Everybody knows this.
     
  10. Smadh_sher14

    Smadh_sher14 New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    Jul 28, 2015
    Agreed. The fact is we can criticise (rightly) the poor choic of opponents from both, but the fight that has to be made is Khan Brook and it's pretty clear khan is the one holding back that fight from happening
     
  11. DeathEater

    DeathEater Active Member Full Member

    947
    2
    Dec 27, 2012
    Porter was a legit win.

    A very good name to have on his resume.

    Don't let the fact that he's fought bums for all the rest of his career blind you. It was a very good victory from a top 5 welterweight on his home turf
     
  12. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,158
    May 30, 2008
    But that's the point, it's a complete joke that Khan was even calling out Mayweather in the first place. He's barely top 10 in the division ffs and hasn't beaten any of the top guys.

    He needs to rematch Garcia and then fight one of Thurman/Brook/Bradley before calling out PBF or Pac.

    Chances of this happening = 0%

    Watch as his next 2 fights will be against hand picked featherfisted opposition like Guerrero.
     
  13. Kahuna

    Kahuna Active Member Full Member

    928
    107
    May 22, 2014
    Bradley, Thurman, Maidana, Porter, Guerro, Berto, Rios, Mayweather.

    MAidana is comfortably this worst boxer in this selection. Of the others, how many has Khan faced?

    Just saying.
     
  14. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    khan wanted garcia immediately after he got tkod by garcia but angel didn't want to give him one

    khan has had only 3 fights at 147....brook has been there his whole life and he only has porter on his resume....
     
  15. billo_billy

    billo_billy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,675
    57
    Mar 24, 2015
    i'm pretty bored with both of them, brook needs to step up his opposition and stop being milked by hearn because in the long run its his reputation which is being affected. Khan just needs to stop talking, either fight brook, thurman or bradley, or try to get a rematch with garcia.

    Hearns events have been boring of late, and i wont be watching the london show this weekend after watching that **** in leeds last saturday. gavin vs eggington will be decent, but thats it.